[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190814101411.lj3p6zjzbjvnnjf4@sirius.home.kraxel.org>
Date: Wed, 14 Aug 2019 12:14:11 +0200
From: Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel@...hat.com>
To: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>
Cc: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@...hat.com>, dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org,
nouveau@...ts.freedesktop.org, amd-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org,
linux-graphics-maintainer@...are.com,
intel-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org, spice-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v6 08/17] drm/ttm: use gem vma_node
Hi,
> > Changing the order doesn't look hard. Patch attached (untested, have no
> > test hardware). But maybe I missed some detail ...
>
> I came up with something very similar by splitting up nouveau_bo_new()
> into allocation and initialization steps, so that when necessary the GEM
> object can be initialized in between. I think that's slightly more
> flexible and easier to understand than a boolean flag.
Yes, that should work too.
Acked-by: Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel@...hat.com>
cheers,
Gerd
Powered by blists - more mailing lists