[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CACAvsv5Rar9F=Wf-9HBpndY4QaQZcGCx05j0esvV9pitM=JoGg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 21 Aug 2019 16:33:58 +1000
From: Ben Skeggs <skeggsb@...il.com>
To: Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel@...hat.com>
Cc: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>,
ML dri-devel <dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
ML nouveau <nouveau@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
intel-gfx <intel-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, amd-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org,
linux-graphics-maintainer@...are.com,
Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@...hat.com>,
spice-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [Nouveau] [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v6 08/17] drm/ttm: use gem vma_node
On Wed, 14 Aug 2019 at 20:14, Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel@...hat.com> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> > > Changing the order doesn't look hard. Patch attached (untested, have no
> > > test hardware). But maybe I missed some detail ...
> >
> > I came up with something very similar by splitting up nouveau_bo_new()
> > into allocation and initialization steps, so that when necessary the GEM
> > object can be initialized in between. I think that's slightly more
> > flexible and easier to understand than a boolean flag.
>
> Yes, that should work too.
>
> Acked-by: Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel@...hat.com>
Acked-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@...hat.com>
>
> cheers,
> Gerd
>
> _______________________________________________
> Nouveau mailing list
> Nouveau@...ts.freedesktop.org
> https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/nouveau
Powered by blists - more mailing lists