linux-kernel - Re: kexec on rk3399

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <4fc3e5b5-31fe-41f6-8031-b37454f21437@gmail.com>
Date:   Wed, 14 Aug 2019 15:15:02 +0200
From:   Vicente Bergas <vicencb@...il.com>
To:     Felipe Balbi <balbi@...nel.org>
Cc:     Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@....com>,
        Heiko Stuebner <heiko@...ech.de>,
        Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
        Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@....com>,
        Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
        Matthias Brugger <mbrugger@...e.com>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        <linux-usb@...r.kernel.org>,
        <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        <linux-rockchip@...ts.infradead.org>,
        <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: kexec on rk3399

On Wednesday, August 14, 2019 3:06:04 PM CEST, Felipe Balbi wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Vicente Bergas <vicencb@...il.com> writes:
>> On Monday, July 22, 2019 4:31:27 PM CEST, Vicente Bergas wrote:
>>> Hi, i have been running linux on rk3399 booted with kexec fine until 5.2
>>> From 5.2 onwards, there are memory corruption issues as reported here:
>>> http://lkml.iu.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/1906.2/07211.html
>>> kexec has been identified as the principal reason for the issues.
>>> 
>>> It turns out that kexec has never worked reliably on this platform, ...
>> 
>> Thank you all for your suggestions on where the issue could be.
>> 
>> It seems that it was the USB driver.
>> Now using v5.2.8 booted with kexec from v5.2.8 with a workaround and
>> so far so good. It is being tested on the Sapphire board.
>> 
>> The workaround is:
>> --- a/drivers/usb/dwc3/dwc3-of-simple.c
>> +++ b/drivers/usb/dwc3/dwc3-of-simple.c
>> @@ -133,6 +133,13 @@
>>  	return 0;
>>  }
>>  
>> +static void dwc3_of_simple_shutdown(struct platform_device *pdev)
>> +{
>> +	struct dwc3_of_simple *simple = platform_get_drvdata(pdev);
>> +
>> +	reset_control_assert(simple->resets);
>> +}
>> +
>>  static int __maybe_unused dwc3_of_simple_runtime_suspend(struct device 
>> *dev)
>>  {
>>  	struct dwc3_of_simple	*simple = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
>> @@ -190,6 +197,7 @@
>>  static struct platform_driver dwc3_of_simple_driver = {
>>  	.probe		= dwc3_of_simple_probe,
>>  	.remove		= dwc3_of_simple_remove,
>> +	.shutdown	= dwc3_of_simple_shutdown,
>>  	.driver		= {
>>  		.name	= "dwc3-of-simple",
>>  		.of_match_table = of_dwc3_simple_match,
>> 
>> If this patch is OK after review i can resubmit it as a pull request.
>
> not a pull request, just send a patch using git send-email
>
>> Should a similar change be applied to drivers/usb/dwc3/core.c ?
>
> Is it necessary? We haven't had any bug reports regarding that. Also, if
> we have reset control support in the core driver, why do we need it in
> of_simple? Seems like of_simple could just rely on what core does.

the workaround has been tested patching only core.c with
--- a/drivers/usb/dwc3/core.c
+++ b/drivers/usb/dwc3/core.c
@@ -1561,6 +1561,13 @@
 	return 0;
 }
 
+static void dwc3_shutdown(struct platform_device *pdev)
+{
+	struct dwc3 *dwc = platform_get_drvdata(pdev);
+
+	reset_control_assert(dwc->reset);
+}
+
 #ifdef CONFIG_PM
 static int dwc3_core_init_for_resume(struct dwc3 *dwc)
 {
@@ -1866,6 +1873,7 @@
 static struct platform_driver dwc3_driver = {
 	.probe		= dwc3_probe,
 	.remove		= dwc3_remove,
+	.shutdown	= dwc3_shutdown,
 	.driver		= {
 		.name	= "dwc3",
 		.of_match_table	= of_match_ptr(of_dwc3_match),

and leaving dwc3-of-simple.c as is, the issue persisted.

Regards,
  Vicenç.