[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <8647b1da-e654-714a-ce6e-7b92110a066f@arm.com>
Date: Wed, 14 Aug 2019 14:37:21 +0100
From: Valentin Schneider <valentin.schneider@....com>
To: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: ak@...ux.intel.com, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
bigeasy@...utronix.de, bp@...e.de, catalin.marinas@....com,
davem@...emloft.net, hch@....de, kan.liang@...el.com,
mingo@...nel.org, peterz@...radead.org, riel@...riel.com,
will@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/9] sched: treewide: use is_kthread()
On 14/08/2019 11:41, Mark Rutland wrote:
> Now that we have is_kthread(), let's convert existing open-coded checks
> of the form:
>
> task->flags & PF_KTHREAD
>
> ... over to the new helper, which makes things a little easier to read,
> and sets a consistent example for new code to follow.
>
[...]
> kernel/sched/core.c | 8 ++++----
> kernel/sched/idle.c | 2 +-
> kernel/sched/wait.c | 2 +-
Looks all sane there for me.
Reviewed-by: Valentin Schneider <valentin.schneider@....com>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists