[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190814133910.GC51963@lakrids.cambridge.arm.com>
Date: Wed, 14 Aug 2019 14:39:10 +0100
From: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>
To: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, ak@...ux.intel.com,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, bp@...e.de, catalin.marinas@....com,
davem@...emloft.net, hch@....de, kan.liang@...el.com,
mingo@...nel.org, peterz@...radead.org, riel@...riel.com,
will@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 8/9] x86/fpu: correctly check for kthreads
On Wed, Aug 14, 2019 at 03:07:08PM +0200, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
> On 2019-08-14 11:41:30 [+0100], Mark Rutland wrote:
> > Per commit:
> >
> > 0cecca9d03c964ab ("x86/fpu: Eager switch PKRU state")
> >
> > ... switch_fpu_state() is trying to distinguish user threads from
> > kthreads, such that kthreads consistently use init_pkru_value. It does
> > do by looking at current->mm.
> >
> > In general, a non-NULL current->mm doesn't imply that current is a
> > kthread, as kthreads can install an mm via use_mm(), and so it's
> > preferable to use is_kthread() to determine whether a thread is a
> > kthread.
>
> I think this was missed in commit.
> 8d3289f2fa1e0 ("x86/fpu: Don't use current->mm to check for a kthread")
Yup, though if it's a bug it's been a bug since commit:
0cecca9d03c964ab ("x86/fpu: Eager switch PKRU state")
... which I guess the fixes tag would have to mention.
>
> A kthread with use_mm() would load here non-existing FPU state.
>
> Acked-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>
Given the above, should I add the fixes tag (for 0cecca9d03c964ab)?
Thanks,
Mark.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists