[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20190815142603.de9f1c0d9fcc017f3237708d@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Thu, 15 Aug 2019 14:26:03 -0700
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To: "Darrick J. Wong" <darrick.wong@...cle.com>
Cc: hch@...radead.org, tytso@....edu, viro@...iv.linux.org.uk,
linux-xfs@...r.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
fstests <fstests@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC 3/2] fstests: check that we can't write to swap
files
On Thu, 15 Aug 2019 09:34:34 -0700 "Darrick J. Wong" <darrick.wong@...cle.com> wrote:
> While active, the media backing a swap file is leased to the kernel.
> Userspace has no business writing to it. Make sure we can't do this.
I don't think this tests the case where a file was already open for
writing and someone does swapon(that file)?
And then does swapoff(that file), when writes should start working again?
Ditto all the above, with s/open/mmap/.
Do we handle (and test!) the case where there's unwritten dirty
pagecache at the time of swapon()? Ditto pte-dirty MAP_SHARED pages?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists