linux-kernel - Re: [RFC/RFT v4 0/5] Add generic trusted keys framework/subsystem

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Thu, 15 Aug 2019 18:33:35 +0530
From:   Sumit Garg <sumit.garg@...aro.org>
To:     Mimi Zohar <zohar@...nel.org>
Cc:     keyrings@...r.kernel.org, linux-integrity@...r.kernel.org,
        "open list:HARDWARE RANDOM NUMBER GENERATOR CORE" 
        <linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org>,
        linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org, dhowells@...hat.com,
        Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>, davem@...emloft.net,
        peterhuewe@....de, jgg@...pe.ca, jejb@...ux.ibm.com,
        Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen@...ux.intel.com>,
        Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        James Morris <jmorris@...ei.org>,
        "Serge E. Hallyn" <serge@...lyn.com>,
        Casey Schaufler <casey@...aufler-ca.com>,
        Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@...aro.org>,
        Daniel Thompson <daniel.thompson@...aro.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "tee-dev @ lists . linaro . org" <tee-dev@...ts.linaro.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC/RFT v4 0/5] Add generic trusted keys framework/subsystem

Hi Mimi,

On Wed, 14 Aug 2019 at 18:54, Mimi Zohar <zohar@...nel.org> wrote:
>
> Hi Sumit,
>
> On Tue, 2019-08-13 at 13:22 +0530, Sumit Garg wrote:
> > This patch-set is an outcome of discussion here [1]. It has evolved very
> > much since v1 to create, consolidate and generalize trusted keys
> > subsystem.
> >
> > This framework has been tested with trusted keys support provided via TEE
> > but I wasn't able to test it with a TPM device as I don't possess one. It
> > would be really helpful if others could test this patch-set using a TPM
> > device.
>
> With the "CONFIG_HEADER_TEST" and "CONFIG_KERNEL_HEADER_TEST" config
> options enabled, which is required for linux-next, it fails to build.
>

TBH, I wasn't aware about this test feature for headers. It looks like
the header which fails this test is "include/keys/trusted_tpm.h" which
is basically a rename of "include/keys/trusted.h" plus changes in this
patch-set.

And "include/keys/trusted.h" header is already put under blacklist
here: "include/Kbuild +68" as it fails to build. So its that rename
due to which build failure is observed now.

It seems to be an easy fix for this build failure via following changes:

diff --git a/include/keys/trusted_tpm.h b/include/keys/trusted_tpm.h
index 7b593447920b..ca1bec0ef65d 100644
--- a/include/keys/trusted_tpm.h
+++ b/include/keys/trusted_tpm.h
@@ -2,6 +2,9 @@
 #ifndef __TRUSTED_TPM_H
 #define __TRUSTED_TPM_H

+#include <keys/trusted-type.h>
+#include <linux/tpm_command.h>
+
 /* implementation specific TPM constants */
 #define MAX_BUF_SIZE                   1024
 #define TPM_GETRANDOM_SIZE             14

So I will include above changes in this patch-set and also remove
"include/keys/trusted.h" header from the blacklist.

-Sumit

> Mimi