[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1565881609.9424.7.camel@kernel.org>
Date: Thu, 15 Aug 2019 11:06:49 -0400
From: Mimi Zohar <zohar@...nel.org>
To: Sumit Garg <sumit.garg@...aro.org>
Cc: keyrings@...r.kernel.org, linux-integrity@...r.kernel.org,
"open list:HARDWARE RANDOM NUMBER GENERATOR CORE"
<linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org, dhowells@...hat.com,
Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>, davem@...emloft.net,
peterhuewe@....de, jgg@...pe.ca, jejb@...ux.ibm.com,
Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen@...ux.intel.com>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
James Morris <jmorris@...ei.org>,
"Serge E. Hallyn" <serge@...lyn.com>,
Casey Schaufler <casey@...aufler-ca.com>,
Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@...aro.org>,
Daniel Thompson <daniel.thompson@...aro.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"tee-dev @ lists . linaro . org" <tee-dev@...ts.linaro.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC/RFT v4 0/5] Add generic trusted keys framework/subsystem
On Thu, 2019-08-15 at 18:33 +0530, Sumit Garg wrote:
> Hi Mimi,
>
> On Wed, 14 Aug 2019 at 18:54, Mimi Zohar <zohar@...nel.org> wrote:
> >
> > Hi Sumit,
> >
> > On Tue, 2019-08-13 at 13:22 +0530, Sumit Garg wrote:
> > > This patch-set is an outcome of discussion here [1]. It has evolved very
> > > much since v1 to create, consolidate and generalize trusted keys
> > > subsystem.
> > >
> > > This framework has been tested with trusted keys support provided via TEE
> > > but I wasn't able to test it with a TPM device as I don't possess one. It
> > > would be really helpful if others could test this patch-set using a TPM
> > > device.
> >
> > With the "CONFIG_HEADER_TEST" and "CONFIG_KERNEL_HEADER_TEST" config
> > options enabled, which is required for linux-next, it fails to build.
> >
>
> TBH, I wasn't aware about this test feature for headers.
It's new to me too.
> It looks like
> the header which fails this test is "include/keys/trusted_tpm.h" which
> is basically a rename of "include/keys/trusted.h" plus changes in this
> patch-set.
>
> And "include/keys/trusted.h" header is already put under blacklist
> here: "include/Kbuild +68" as it fails to build. So its that rename
> due to which build failure is observed now.
>
> It seems to be an easy fix for this build failure via following changes:
>
> diff --git a/include/keys/trusted_tpm.h b/include/keys/trusted_tpm.h
> index 7b593447920b..ca1bec0ef65d 100644
> --- a/include/keys/trusted_tpm.h
> +++ b/include/keys/trusted_tpm.h
> @@ -2,6 +2,9 @@
> #ifndef __TRUSTED_TPM_H
> #define __TRUSTED_TPM_H
>
> +#include <keys/trusted-type.h>
> +#include <linux/tpm_command.h>
> +
> /* implementation specific TPM constants */
> #define MAX_BUF_SIZE 1024
> #define TPM_GETRANDOM_SIZE 14
>
> So I will include above changes in this patch-set and also remove
> "include/keys/trusted.h" header from the blacklist.
That works, thanks. With this patch set, at least the EVM trusted key
is properly being decrypted by the encrypted key with both a TPM 1.2
and PTT TPM 2.0. My laptop still boots properly. Over the weekend
I'll try to actually review the patches.
Mimi
Powered by blists - more mailing lists