linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 2/3] x86: cpu: Add new Intel Atom CPU type

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <d6452a93-16a7-451e-3abb-0bc65e89b0aa@linux.intel.com>
Date:   Fri, 16 Aug 2019 15:25:51 +0800
From:   "Tanwar, Rahul" <rahul.tanwar@...ux.intel.com>
To:     Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
Cc:     Tony Luck <tony.luck@...el.com>, tglx@...utronix.de,
        mingo@...hat.com, hpa@...or.com, x86@...nel.org,
        andriy.shevchenko@...el.com, alan@...ux.intel.com,
        ricardo.neri-calderon@...ux.intel.com, rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, qi-ming.wu@...el.com,
        cheol.yong.kim@...el.com, rahul.tanwar@...el.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] x86: cpu: Add new Intel Atom CPU type


On 16/8/2019 2:43 PM, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> Now to another question: you see how I put my reply to the previous mail
> *below* the quoted text. Why is yours ontop? Why not put it after mine
> since you're replying to it, like it is usually done on the mailing
> lists and thus not confuse the reading order?
>
> All I'm trying to say is, please do not top-post.

So sorry for missing out on this point. Will always keep in mind from 
now on.


Regards,

Rahul