linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 2/3] x86: cpu: Add new Intel Atom CPU type

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20190816073810.GI18980@zn.tnic>
Date:   Fri, 16 Aug 2019 09:38:10 +0200
From:   Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
To:     "Tanwar, Rahul" <rahul.tanwar@...ux.intel.com>
Cc:     Tony Luck <tony.luck@...el.com>, tglx@...utronix.de,
        mingo@...hat.com, hpa@...or.com, x86@...nel.org,
        andriy.shevchenko@...el.com, alan@...ux.intel.com,
        ricardo.neri-calderon@...ux.intel.com, rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, qi-ming.wu@...el.com,
        cheol.yong.kim@...el.com, rahul.tanwar@...el.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] x86: cpu: Add new Intel Atom CPU type

On Fri, Aug 16, 2019 at 03:25:51PM +0800, Tanwar, Rahul wrote:
> 
> On 16/8/2019 2:43 PM, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> > Now to another question: you see how I put my reply to the previous mail
> > *below* the quoted text. Why is yours ontop? Why not put it after mine
> > since you're replying to it, like it is usually done on the mailing
> > lists and thus not confuse the reading order?
> > 
> > All I'm trying to say is, please do not top-post.
> 
> So sorry for missing out on this point. Will always keep in mind from now
> on.

Thanks!

-- 
Regards/Gruss,
    Boris.

Good mailing practices for 400: avoid top-posting and trim the reply.