[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190819065814.333kowws4mpw3qfx@vireshk-i7>
Date: Mon, 19 Aug 2019 12:28:14 +0530
From: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
To: Colin King <colin.king@...onical.com>
Cc: "Rafael J . Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] cpufreq: remove redundant assignment to ret
On 13-08-19, 13:21, Colin King wrote:
> From: Colin Ian King <colin.king@...onical.com>
>
> Variable ret is initialized to a value that is never read and it is
> re-assigned later. The initialization is redundant and can be removed.
>
> Addresses-Coverity: ("Unused value")
> Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.king@...onical.com>
> ---
> drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
> index c28ebf2810f1..26d82e0a2de5 100644
> --- a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
> +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
> @@ -2140,7 +2140,7 @@ int cpufreq_driver_target(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
> unsigned int target_freq,
> unsigned int relation)
> {
> - int ret = -EINVAL;
> + int ret;
>
> down_write(&policy->rwsem);
>
Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
--
viresh
Powered by blists - more mailing lists