[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <2250924.CPEEF64KPg@kreacher>
Date: Mon, 26 Aug 2019 11:20:21 +0200
From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>
To: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>,
Colin King <colin.king@...onical.com>
Cc: linux-pm@...r.kernel.org, kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] cpufreq: remove redundant assignment to ret
On Monday, August 19, 2019 8:58:14 AM CEST Viresh Kumar wrote:
> On 13-08-19, 13:21, Colin King wrote:
> > From: Colin Ian King <colin.king@...onical.com>
> >
> > Variable ret is initialized to a value that is never read and it is
> > re-assigned later. The initialization is redundant and can be removed.
> >
> > Addresses-Coverity: ("Unused value")
> > Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.king@...onical.com>
> > ---
> > drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c | 2 +-
> > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
> > index c28ebf2810f1..26d82e0a2de5 100644
> > --- a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
> > +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
> > @@ -2140,7 +2140,7 @@ int cpufreq_driver_target(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
> > unsigned int target_freq,
> > unsigned int relation)
> > {
> > - int ret = -EINVAL;
> > + int ret;
> >
> > down_write(&policy->rwsem);
> >
>
> Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
>
>
Patch applied, thanks!
Powered by blists - more mailing lists