[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.44L0.1908191017560.1506-100000@iolanthe.rowland.org>
Date: Mon, 19 Aug 2019 10:19:44 -0400 (EDT)
From: Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>
To: Roger Quadros <rogerq@...com>
cc: Pawel Laszczak <pawell@...ence.com>,
<felipe.balbi@...ux.intel.com>, <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
<linux-usb@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
<jbergsagel@...com>, <nsekhar@...com>, <nm@...com>,
<sureshp@...ence.com>, <jpawar@...ence.com>, <kurahul@...ence.com>,
<aniljoy@...ence.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v10 0/6] Introduced new Cadence USBSS DRD Driver.
On Mon, 19 Aug 2019, Roger Quadros wrote:
> On 15/08/2019 17:39, Alan Stern wrote:
> > On Thu, 15 Aug 2019, Roger Quadros wrote:
> >
> >> Felipe & Alan,
> >>
> >> On 21/07/2019 21:32, Pawel Laszczak wrote:
> >>> This patch introduce new Cadence USBSS DRD driver to linux kernel.
> >>>
> >>> The Cadence USBSS DRD Controller is a highly configurable IP Core which
> >>> can be instantiated as Dual-Role Device (DRD), Peripheral Only and
> >>> Host Only (XHCI)configurations.
> >>>
> >>> The current driver has been validated with FPGA burned. We have support
> >>> for PCIe bus, which is used on FPGA prototyping.
> >>>
> >>> The host side of USBSS-DRD controller is compliance with XHCI
> >>> specification, so it works with standard XHCI Linux driver.
> >>
> >> While testing this driver I encountered the following issue if I do the following.
> >>
> >> 1) USB port is "otg" and nothing connected so it is in IDLE mode to begin with.
> >> i.e. HCD & UDC not registered.
> >>
> >> 2) Load mass storage gadget with backing medium.
> >> > modprobe g_mass_storage file=lun stall=0
> >>
> >> [ 28.172142] udc-core: couldn't find an available UDC - added [g_mass_storage] to list of pending drivers
> >>
> >> 3) Connect port to PC host
...
> >> [ 30.786313] Mass Storage Function, version: 2009/09/11
> >> [ 30.791455] LUN: removable file: (no medium)
> >> [ 31.039497] lun0: unable to open backing file: 500M.bin
> >> Is opening the backing file from irq_thread_fn the issue here?
> >> If yes, how to resolve this?
> >
> > I would guess that it probably is related to that.
> >
> > In any case, the backing filename should be an explicit complete path.
> > Who knows what the current directory will be when the actual open call
> > takes place?
>
> This seems to be the case. It works fine with complete path.
>
> Do we need to care about this in the mass storage gadget or just
> rely on the user to provide the full path?
I think it's okay to rely on the user to provide the full path.
Alan Stern
Powered by blists - more mailing lists