linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 4/4] clk: qcom: clk-rpmh: Add support for SM8150

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20190820050944.GL26807@tuxbook-pro>
Date:   Mon, 19 Aug 2019 22:09:44 -0700
From:   Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>
To:     Vinod Koul <vkoul@...nel.org>
Cc:     Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
        Andy Gross <agross@...nel.org>,
        Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>, linux-clk@...r.kernel.org,
        devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 4/4] clk: qcom: clk-rpmh: Add support for SM8150

On Mon 19 Aug 00:39 PDT 2019, Vinod Koul wrote:

> Add support for rpmh clocks found in SM8150
> 
> Signed-off-by: Vinod Koul <vkoul@...nel.org>
> ---
>  drivers/clk/qcom/clk-rpmh.c | 27 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 27 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/clk/qcom/clk-rpmh.c b/drivers/clk/qcom/clk-rpmh.c
> index 16d689e5bb3c..3b304a3fb5c9 100644
> --- a/drivers/clk/qcom/clk-rpmh.c
> +++ b/drivers/clk/qcom/clk-rpmh.c
> @@ -374,6 +374,32 @@ static const struct clk_rpmh_desc clk_rpmh_sdm845 = {
>  	.num_clks = ARRAY_SIZE(sdm845_rpmh_clocks),
>  };
>  
> +DEFINE_CLK_RPMH_ARC(sm8150, bi_tcxo, bi_tcxo_ao, "xo.lvl", 0x3, 2);
> +DEFINE_CLK_RPMH_VRM(sm8150, ln_bb_clk2, ln_bb_clk2_ao, "lnbclka2", 2);
> +DEFINE_CLK_RPMH_VRM(sm8150, ln_bb_clk3, ln_bb_clk3_ao, "lnbclka3", 2);
> +DEFINE_CLK_RPMH_VRM(sm8150, rf_clk1, rf_clk1_ao, "rfclka1", 1);
> +DEFINE_CLK_RPMH_VRM(sm8150, rf_clk2, rf_clk2_ao, "rfclka2", 1);
> +DEFINE_CLK_RPMH_VRM(sm8150, rf_clk3, rf_clk3_ao, "rfclka3", 1);
> +
> +static struct clk_hw *sm8150_rpmh_clocks[] = {
> +	[RPMH_CXO_CLK]		= &sm8150_bi_tcxo.hw,
> +	[RPMH_CXO_CLK_A]	= &sm8150_bi_tcxo_ao.hw,
> +	[RPMH_LN_BB_CLK2]	= &sm8150_ln_bb_clk2.hw,
> +	[RPMH_LN_BB_CLK2_A]	= &sm8150_ln_bb_clk2_ao.hw,
> +	[RPMH_LN_BB_CLK3]	= &sm8150_ln_bb_clk3.hw,
> +	[RPMH_LN_BB_CLK3_A]	= &sm8150_ln_bb_clk3_ao.hw,
> +	[RPMH_RF_CLK1]		= &sm8150_rf_clk1.hw,
> +	[RPMH_RF_CLK1_A]	= &sm8150_rf_clk1_ao.hw,
> +	[RPMH_RF_CLK2]		= &sm8150_rf_clk2.hw,
> +	[RPMH_RF_CLK2_A]	= &sm8150_rf_clk2_ao.hw,
> +	[RPMH_RF_CLK3]		= &sm8150_rf_clk3.hw,
> +	[RPMH_RF_CLK3_A]	= &sm8150_rf_clk3_ao.hw,
> +};
> +
> +static const struct clk_rpmh_desc clk_rpmh_sm8150 = {
> +	.clks = sm8150_rpmh_clocks,
> +	.num_clks = ARRAY_SIZE(sm8150_rpmh_clocks),
> +};

Maybe an empty line here?

>  static struct clk_hw *of_clk_rpmh_hw_get(struct of_phandle_args *clkspec,
>  					 void *data)
>  {
> @@ -453,6 +479,7 @@ static int clk_rpmh_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>  
>  static const struct of_device_id clk_rpmh_match_table[] = {
>  	{ .compatible = "qcom,sdm845-rpmh-clk", .data = &clk_rpmh_sdm845},
> +	{ .compatible = "qcom,sm8150-rpmh-clk", .data = &clk_rpmh_sm8150},
>  	{ }
>  };
>  MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, clk_rpmh_match_table);

Reviewed-by: Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>

Regards,
Bjorn

> -- 
> 2.20.1
>