lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Thu, 22 Aug 2019 19:29:17 +0530
From:   Vinod Koul <vkoul@...nel.org>
To:     Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>
Cc:     Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
        Andy Gross <agross@...nel.org>,
        Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>, linux-clk@...r.kernel.org,
        devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/4] clk: qcom: clk-rpmh: Convert to parent data scheme

On 19-08-19, 22:08, Bjorn Andersson wrote:
> On Mon 19 Aug 00:39 PDT 2019, Vinod Koul wrote:
> 
> > Convert the rpmh clock driver to use the new parent data scheme by
> > specifying the parent data for board clock.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Vinod Koul <vkoul@...nel.org>
> > ---
> >  drivers/clk/qcom/clk-rpmh.c | 10 ++++++++--
> >  1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/clk/qcom/clk-rpmh.c b/drivers/clk/qcom/clk-rpmh.c
> > index c3fd632af119..16d689e5bb3c 100644
> > --- a/drivers/clk/qcom/clk-rpmh.c
> > +++ b/drivers/clk/qcom/clk-rpmh.c
> > @@ -95,7 +95,10 @@ static DEFINE_MUTEX(rpmh_clk_lock);
> >  		.hw.init = &(struct clk_init_data){			\
> >  			.ops = &clk_rpmh_ops,				\
> >  			.name = #_name,					\
> > -			.parent_names = (const char *[]){ "xo_board" },	\
> > +			.parent_data =  &(const struct clk_parent_data){ \
> > +					.fw_name = "xo",		\
> > +					.name = "xo",		\
> 
> Shouldn't .name be "xo_board" to retain backwards compatibility?

Yes I have updated that

Thanks
-- 
~Vinod

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ