linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] riscv: move sifive_l2

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAJ2_jOE+JX201biExFRziPTuw3tYFJwsrc5h-Uvg+=fcaobTww@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Tue, 20 Aug 2019 11:33:07 +0530
From:   Yash Shah <yash.shah@...ive.com>
To:     Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
Cc:     Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
        Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@...ive.com>,
        Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@...ive.com>,
        linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org, linux-edac@...r.kernel.org,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org List" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] riscv: move sifive_l2_cache.c to drivers/soc

On Mon, Aug 19, 2019 at 11:56 AM Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de> wrote:
>
> On Mon, Aug 19, 2019 at 08:09:04AM +0200, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> > On Sun, Aug 18, 2019 at 10:29:35AM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > > The sifive_l2_cache.c is in no way related to RISC-V architecture
> > > memory management.  It is a little stub driver working around the fact
> > > that the EDAC maintainers prefer their drivers to be structured in a
> > > certain way
> >
> > That changed recently so I guess we can do the per-IP block driver after
> > all, if people would still prefer it.
>
> That would seem like the best idea.  But I don't really know this code
> well enough myself, and I really need to get this code out of the
> forced on RISC-V codebase as some SOCs I'm working with simply don't
> have the memory for it..
>
> So unless someone signs up to do a per-IP block edac drivers instead
> very quickly I'd still like to see something like this go into 5.4
> for now.

As of now, we can pull this patch into 5.4. Later, I will review if
per-IP block edac driver is needed and if so, will take care of
implementing it.

- Yash