[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5b90de84-5531-b8f3-65a7-0009c4a4f8f1@linux.intel.com>
Date: Thu, 22 Aug 2019 17:38:38 +0800
From: "Tanwar, Rahul" <rahul.tanwar@...ux.intel.com>
To: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com>,
Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...el.com>
Cc: tglx@...utronix.de, mingo@...hat.com, bp@...en8.de, hpa@...or.com,
tony.luck@...el.com, x86@...nel.org, a.zummo@...ertech.it,
robh+dt@...nel.org, mark.rutland@....com,
linux-rtc@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
alan@...ux.intel.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
qi-ming.wu@...el.com, cheol.yong.kim@...el.com,
rahul.tanwar@...el.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 2/2] dt-bindings: rtc: Add optional status property
On 22/8/2019 5:09 PM, Alexandre Belloni wrote:
> On 22/08/2019 11:56:59+0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
>> On Thu, Aug 22, 2019 at 03:44:04PM +0800, Rahul Tanwar wrote:
>>> Some products may not support MC146818 RTC CMOS device. Introduce a optional
>>> 'status' standard property for RTC-CMOS to indicate if the MC146818 RTC device
>>> is available (status="okay") or not (status="disabled")
>> This needs to be converted to YAML
>>
> Well, I think the status property doesn't even need to be documented
> because it is simply the generic behaviour.
Thanks for your comments. I now realize it. I will omit posting this again.
Regards,
Rahul
Powered by blists - more mailing lists