[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190822090948.GQ27031@piout.net>
Date: Thu, 22 Aug 2019 11:09:48 +0200
From: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com>
To: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...el.com>
Cc: Rahul Tanwar <rahul.tanwar@...ux.intel.com>, tglx@...utronix.de,
mingo@...hat.com, bp@...en8.de, hpa@...or.com, tony.luck@...el.com,
x86@...nel.org, a.zummo@...ertech.it, robh+dt@...nel.org,
mark.rutland@....com, linux-rtc@...r.kernel.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, alan@...ux.intel.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, qi-ming.wu@...el.com,
cheol.yong.kim@...el.com, rahul.tanwar@...el.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 2/2] dt-bindings: rtc: Add optional status property
On 22/08/2019 11:56:59+0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 22, 2019 at 03:44:04PM +0800, Rahul Tanwar wrote:
> > Some products may not support MC146818 RTC CMOS device. Introduce a optional
> > 'status' standard property for RTC-CMOS to indicate if the MC146818 RTC device
> > is available (status="okay") or not (status="disabled")
>
> This needs to be converted to YAML
>
Well, I think the status property doesn't even need to be documented
because it is simply the generic behaviour.
--
Alexandre Belloni, Bootlin
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
https://bootlin.com
Powered by blists - more mailing lists