[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <f8e9cbdd-1926-081d-c8e6-f9d55408fe51@linux.ibm.com>
Date: Mon, 26 Aug 2019 16:46:18 +0530
From: Hari Bathini <hbathini@...ux.ibm.com>
To: Sourabh Jain <sourabhjain@...ux.ibm.com>, mpe@...erman.id.au
Cc: mahesh@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
corbet@....net
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] powerpc/fadump: sysfs for fadump memory reservation
On 26/08/19 4:14 PM, Sourabh Jain wrote:
>
>
> On 8/26/19 3:46 PM, Sourabh Jain wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 8/26/19 3:29 PM, Hari Bathini wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> On 10/08/19 11:29 PM, Sourabh Jain wrote:
>>>> Add a sys interface to allow querying the memory reserved by
>>>> fadump for saving the crash dump.
>>>>
>>>> Add an ABI doc entry for new sysfs interface.
>>>> - /sys/kernel/fadump_mem_reserved
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Sourabh Jain <sourabhjain@...ux.ibm.com>
>>>> ---
>>>> Changelog:
>>>> v1 -> v2:
>>>> - Added ABI doc for new sysfs interface.
>>>>
>>>> v2 -> v3:
>>>> - Updated the ABI documentation.
>>>> ---
>>>>
>>>> Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-kernel-fadump | 6 ++++++
>>>
>>> Shouldn't this be Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-kernel-fadump_mem_reserved?
>
> How about documenting fadump_mem_reserved and other sysfs attributes suggested
> by you in a single file Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-kernel-fadump?
I wouldn't mind that but please do check if it is breaking a convention..
- Hari
Powered by blists - more mailing lists