[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190826140131.GA15270@kroah.com>
Date: Mon, 26 Aug 2019 16:01:31 +0200
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: Nayna Jain <nayna@...ux.ibm.com>
Cc: linuxppc-dev@...abs.org, linux-efi@...r.kernel.org,
linux-integrity@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>,
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@...aro.org>,
Jeremy Kerr <jk@...abs.org>,
Matthew Garret <matthew.garret@...ula.com>,
Mimi Zohar <zohar@...ux.ibm.com>,
Claudio Carvalho <cclaudio@...ux.ibm.com>,
George Wilson <gcwilson@...ux.ibm.com>,
Elaine Palmer <erpalmer@...ibm.com>,
Eric Ricther <erichte@...ux.ibm.com>,
Oliver O'Halloran <oohall@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/4] powerpc: expose secure variables to userspace via
sysfs
On Mon, Aug 26, 2019 at 09:23:36AM -0400, Nayna Jain wrote:
> +static struct bin_attribute update_attr = {
> + .attr = {.name = "update", .mode = 0200},
> + .size = VARIABLE_MAX_SIZE,
> + .write = update_write,
> +};
Ah, do we need a __BIN_ATTR_WO() macro for you? That would make this
more obvious, right?
Other than that minor thing (not a complaint at all) looks much better
to me, nice work:
Reviewed-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists