[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ff9674e1-1b27-783a-38f3-4fd725353186@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date: Mon, 26 Aug 2019 10:12:48 -0400
From: Nayna <nayna@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Nayna Jain <nayna@...ux.ibm.com>
Cc: linuxppc-dev@...abs.org, linux-efi@...r.kernel.org,
linux-integrity@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>,
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@...aro.org>,
Jeremy Kerr <jk@...abs.org>,
Matthew Garret <matthew.garret@...ula.com>,
Mimi Zohar <zohar@...ux.ibm.com>,
Claudio Carvalho <cclaudio@...ux.ibm.com>,
George Wilson <gcwilson@...ux.ibm.com>,
Elaine Palmer <erpalmer@...ibm.com>,
Eric Ricther <erichte@...ux.ibm.com>,
"Oliver O'Halloran" <oohall@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/4] powerpc: expose secure variables to userspace via
sysfs
On 08/26/2019 10:01 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 26, 2019 at 09:23:36AM -0400, Nayna Jain wrote:
>> +static struct bin_attribute update_attr = {
>> + .attr = {.name = "update", .mode = 0200},
>> + .size = VARIABLE_MAX_SIZE,
>> + .write = update_write,
>> +};
> Ah, do we need a __BIN_ATTR_WO() macro for you? That would make this
> more obvious, right?
Thanks Greg. Yes, I agree it will be good to have that.
Thanks & Regards,
- Nayna
Powered by blists - more mailing lists