[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190827131727.GA25843@lenoir>
Date: Tue, 27 Aug 2019 15:17:28 +0200
From: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@...nel.org>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
John Stultz <john.stultz@...aro.org>,
Anna-Maria Behnsen <anna-maria@...utronix.de>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
Subject: Re: [patch V2 38/38] posix-cpu-timers: Utilize timerqueue for storage
On Tue, Aug 27, 2019 at 08:08:06AM +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> On Tue, 27 Aug 2019, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
>
> > On Wed, Aug 21, 2019 at 09:09:25PM +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> > > /**
> > > @@ -92,14 +130,10 @@ struct posix_cputimers {
> > >
> > > static inline void posix_cputimers_init(struct posix_cputimers *pct)
> > > {
> > > - pct->timers_active = 0;
> > > - pct->expiry_active = 0;
> >
> > No more need to initialize these?
> >
> > > + memset(pct->bases, 0, sizeof(pct->bases));
>
> memset() does that IIRC :)
But those two fields aren't part of pct->bases, are they? :)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists