linux-kernel - [PATCH -next] btrfs: Make inc_block_group

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20190827134312.15216-1-yuehaibing@huawei.com>
Date:   Tue, 27 Aug 2019 21:43:12 +0800
From:   YueHaibing <yuehaibing@...wei.com>
To:     <clm@...com>, <josef@...icpanda.com>, <dsterba@...e.com>
CC:     <linux-btrfs@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        YueHaibing <yuehaibing@...wei.com>
Subject: [PATCH -next] btrfs: Make inc_block_group_ro static

Fix sparse warning:

fs/btrfs/block-group.c:1183:5: warning:
 symbol 'inc_block_group_ro' was not declared. Should it be static?

Reported-by: Hulk Robot <hulkci@...wei.com>
Signed-off-by: YueHaibing <yuehaibing@...wei.com>
---
 fs/btrfs/block-group.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/fs/btrfs/block-group.c b/fs/btrfs/block-group.c
index 3147e84..8cc7768 100644
--- a/fs/btrfs/block-group.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/block-group.c
@@ -1180,7 +1180,7 @@ struct btrfs_trans_handle *btrfs_start_trans_remove_block_group(
  * data in this block group. That check should be done by relocation routine,
  * not this function.
  */
-int inc_block_group_ro(struct btrfs_block_group_cache *cache, int force)
+static int inc_block_group_ro(struct btrfs_block_group_cache *cache, int force)
 {
 	struct btrfs_space_info *sinfo = cache->space_info;
 	u64 num_bytes;
-- 
2.7.4