[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CADnq5_ME=erztEhDhW5Z2RYr7kpMT_OOHm2xyJDPGd8a2d3LuA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 27 Aug 2019 14:02:18 -0400
From: Alex Deucher <alexdeucher@...il.com>
To: Raul E Rangel <rrangel@...omium.org>
Cc: amd-gfx list <amd-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
"David (ChunMing) Zhou" <David1.Zhou@....com>,
Charlene Liu <charlene.liu@....com>,
Leo Li <sunpeng.li@....com>,
Harry Wentland <harry.wentland@....com>,
David Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Maling list - DRI developers
<dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
Nikola Cornij <nikola.cornij@....com>,
Dmytro Laktyushkin <Dmytro.Laktyushkin@....com>,
hersen wu <hersenxs.wu@....com>,
Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>,
Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@....com>,
Jun Lei <Jun.Lei@....com>,
Bhawanpreet Lakha <Bhawanpreet.Lakha@....com>,
Christian König <christian.koenig@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/amd/display: fix struct init in update_bounding_box
On Tue, Aug 27, 2019 at 1:33 PM Raul E Rangel <rrangel@...omium.org> wrote:
>
> dcn20_resource.c:2636:9: error: missing braces around initializer [-Werror=missing-braces]
> struct _vcs_dpi_voltage_scaling_st calculated_states[MAX_CLOCK_LIMIT_STATES] = {0};
> ^
>
> Fixes: 7ed4e6352c16f ("drm/amd/display: Add DCN2 HW Sequencer and Resource")
>
> Signed-off-by: Raul E Rangel <rrangel@...omium.org>
> ---
>
> drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/dc/dcn20/dcn20_resource.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/dc/dcn20/dcn20_resource.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/dc/dcn20/dcn20_resource.c
> index b949e202d6cb..d8dd99bfa275 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/dc/dcn20/dcn20_resource.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/dc/dcn20/dcn20_resource.c
> @@ -2633,7 +2633,7 @@ static void cap_soc_clocks(
> static void update_bounding_box(struct dc *dc, struct _vcs_dpi_soc_bounding_box_st *bb,
> struct pp_smu_nv_clock_table *max_clocks, unsigned int *uclk_states, unsigned int num_states)
> {
> - struct _vcs_dpi_voltage_scaling_st calculated_states[MAX_CLOCK_LIMIT_STATES] = {0};
> + struct _vcs_dpi_voltage_scaling_st calculated_states[MAX_CLOCK_LIMIT_STATES] = {};
I think it would be better to just use a memset. Different compilers
seems to do the wrong thing with these sort of initializations.
Alex
> int i;
> int num_calculated_states = 0;
> int min_dcfclk = 0;
> --
> 2.23.0.187.g17f5b7556c-goog
>
> _______________________________________________
> amd-gfx mailing list
> amd-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org
> https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/amd-gfx
Powered by blists - more mailing lists