[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190827180320.GE23391@sirena.co.uk>
Date: Tue, 27 Aug 2019 19:03:20 +0100
From: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To: Ashish Kumar <ashish.kumar@....com>
Cc: "shawnguo@...nel.org" <shawnguo@...nel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-spi@...r.kernel.org" <linux-spi@...r.kernel.org>,
"devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
"robh+dt@...nel.org" <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
"mark.rutland@....com" <mark.rutland@....com>,
"linux-next@...r.kernel.org" <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
Kuldeep Singh <kuldeep.singh@....com>
Subject: Re: [EXT] Re: [Patch v4 1/3] dt-bindings: spi: spi-fsl-qspi: Add
ls2080a compatibility string to bindings
On Mon, Aug 26, 2019 at 06:19:53AM +0000, Ashish Kumar wrote:
> For Patch-2, I intended to use this in arm64/boot/dts/freescale/fsl-ls1088a.dtsi (please see below), since both ls1088 and ls2080 has same QSPI controller.
> So I had introduced new compatible
> + "fsl,ls1012a-qspi" followed by "fsl,ls1021a-qspi"
> + "fsl,ls1088a-qspi" followed by "fsl,ls2080a-qspi"
Even if the compatible is supposed to be used in conjunction with
other fallbacks it should still explicitly be there in case
someone forgets or decides not to do that for some reason.
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (489 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists