linux-kernel - Re: [EXT] Re: [Patch v4 1/3] dt-bindings: spi: spi-fsl-qspi: Add ls2080a compatibility string to bindings

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20190827155005.GA18581@bogus>
Date:   Tue, 27 Aug 2019 10:50:05 -0500
From:   Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
To:     Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
Cc:     Ashish Kumar <ashish.kumar@....com>,
        "shawnguo@...nel.org" <shawnguo@...nel.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-spi@...r.kernel.org" <linux-spi@...r.kernel.org>,
        "devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
        "mark.rutland@....com" <mark.rutland@....com>,
        "linux-next@...r.kernel.org" <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
        Kuldeep Singh <kuldeep.singh@....com>
Subject: Re: [EXT] Re: [Patch v4 1/3] dt-bindings: spi: spi-fsl-qspi: Add
 ls2080a compatibility string to bindings

On Thu, Aug 22, 2019 at 07:49:27PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 22, 2019 at 06:39:18AM +0000, Ashish Kumar wrote:
> 
> > > > Please use subject lines matching the style for the subsystem.  This
> > > > makes it easier for people to identify relevant patches.
> > Hi Mark,
> 
> > After looking at some patch in Documentation/devicetree/bindings/spi/
> > I think I should update subject line to
> > dt-bindings: spi: Add ls2080-qspi compatible string for FSL QSPI driver
> > or 
> > doc: qspi: Add ls2080-qspi compatible to DT bindings for FSL QSPI driver
> 
> Drop the dt-bindings:.

If you do 'git log --oneline Documentation/devicetree/bindings/' you'll 
notice that SPI and ASoC are the oddballs now. I don't really care
except it does add to tribal knowledge needed regarding maintainers' 
requirements.

Rob