[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <DB7PR04MB4011C9785D8D9CDFE9BC62DD95A10@DB7PR04MB4011.eurprd04.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Mon, 26 Aug 2019 06:19:53 +0000
From: Ashish Kumar <ashish.kumar@....com>
To: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
CC: "shawnguo@...nel.org" <shawnguo@...nel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-spi@...r.kernel.org" <linux-spi@...r.kernel.org>,
"devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
"robh+dt@...nel.org" <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
"mark.rutland@....com" <mark.rutland@....com>,
"linux-next@...r.kernel.org" <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
Kuldeep Singh <kuldeep.singh@....com>
Subject: RE: [EXT] Re: [Patch v4 1/3] dt-bindings: spi: spi-fsl-qspi: Add
ls2080a compatibility string to bindings
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
> Sent: Friday, August 23, 2019 12:35 AM
> To: Ashish Kumar <ashish.kumar@....com>
> Cc: shawnguo@...nel.org; linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org; linux-
> spi@...r.kernel.org; devicetree@...r.kernel.org; robh+dt@...nel.org;
> mark.rutland@....com; linux-next@...r.kernel.org; Kuldeep Singh
> <kuldeep.singh@....com>
> Subject: Re: [EXT] Re: [Patch v4 1/3] dt-bindings: spi: spi-fsl-qspi: Add ls2080a
> compatibility string to bindings
>
> On Wed, Aug 21, 2019 at 02:18:43PM +0000, Ashish Kumar wrote:
>
> Please fix your mail client to word wrap within paragraphs at something
> substantially less than 80 columns. Doing this makes your messages much
> easier to read and reply to.
>
> > Snippet from driver spi-fsl-qspi.c
> > static const struct of_device_id fsl_qspi_dt_ids[] = {
> > { .compatible = "fsl,vf610-qspi", .data = &vybrid_data, },
> > { .compatible = "fsl,imx6sx-qspi", .data = &imx6sx_data, },
> > { .compatible = "fsl,imx7d-qspi", .data = &imx7d_data, },
> > { .compatible = "fsl,imx6ul-qspi", .data = &imx6ul_data, },
> > { .compatible = "fsl,ls1021a-qspi", .data = &ls1021a_data, },
> > { .compatible = "fsl,ls2080a-qspi", .data = &ls2080a_data, },
> > { /* sentinel */ }
> > };
>
> > I had previously sent dts patch based out of Shawn's tree with
> > dependency on these dt binding patch. To which Shawn had replied to
> > get dependency patch accepted first before sending this dts change.
>
> Right, there appears to be an entry for patch 1 which was added without the
> binding doc being updated - patch 2 looks to not have the compatibles in the
> driver though?
Hi Mark,
For Patch-2, I intended to use this in arm64/boot/dts/freescale/fsl-ls1088a.dtsi (please see below), since both ls1088 and ls2080 has same QSPI controller.
So I had introduced new compatible
+ "fsl,ls1012a-qspi" followed by "fsl,ls1021a-qspi"
+ "fsl,ls1088a-qspi" followed by "fsl,ls2080a-qspi"
Now the dtsi will look like this:
qspi: spi@...0000 {
compatible = "fsl,ls2080a-qspi", "fsl,ls1088a-qspi";
#address-cells = <1>;
#size-cells = <0>;
reg = <0x0 0x20c0000 0x0 0x10000>,
<0x0 0x20000000 0x0 0x10000000>;
reg-names = "QuadSPI", "QuadSPI-memory";
interrupts = <GIC_SPI 25 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>;
clock-names = "qspi_en", "qspi";
clocks = <&clockgen 4 3>, <&clockgen 4 3>;
status = "disabled";
};
If you think this is incorrect, then I can add this in driver
{ .compatible = "fsl,ls1088a-qspi", .data = &ls2080a_data, },
Regards
Ashish
Powered by blists - more mailing lists