[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190828084351.GC29927@kroah.com>
Date: Wed, 28 Aug 2019 10:43:51 +0200
From: Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>
To: Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, yu.c.chen@...el.com,
stable-commits@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Patch "x86/pm: Introduce quirk framework to save/restore extra
MSR registers around suspend/resume" has been added to the 4.4-stable tree
On Wed, Aug 28, 2019 at 12:12:39AM -0400, Sasha Levin wrote:
> This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled
>
> x86/pm: Introduce quirk framework to save/restore extra MSR registers around suspend/resume
>
> to the 4.4-stable tree which can be found at:
> http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git;a=summary
>
> The filename of the patch is:
> x86-pm-introduce-quirk-framework-to-save-restore-ext.patch
> and it can be found in the queue-4.4 subdirectory.
>
> If you, or anyone else, feels it should not be added to the stable tree,
> please let <stable@...r.kernel.org> know about it.
>
>
>
> commit d63273440aa0fdebc30d0c931f15f79beb213134
> Author: Chen Yu <yu.c.chen@...el.com>
> Date: Wed Nov 25 01:03:41 2015 +0800
>
> x86/pm: Introduce quirk framework to save/restore extra MSR registers around suspend/resume
>
> A bug was reported that on certain Broadwell platforms, after
> resuming from S3, the CPU is running at an anomalously low
> speed.
>
> It turns out that the BIOS has modified the value of the
> THERM_CONTROL register during S3, and changed it from 0 to 0x10,
> thus enabled clock modulation(bit4), but with undefined CPU Duty
> Cycle(bit1:3) - which causes the problem.
>
> Here is a simple scenario to reproduce the issue:
>
> 1. Boot up the system
> 2. Get MSR 0x19a, it should be 0
> 3. Put the system into sleep, then wake it up
> 4. Get MSR 0x19a, it shows 0x10, while it should be 0
>
> Although some BIOSen want to change the CPU Duty Cycle during
> S3, in our case we don't want the BIOS to do any modification.
>
> Fix this issue by introducing a more generic x86 framework to
> save/restore specified MSR registers(THERM_CONTROL in this case)
> for suspend/resume. This allows us to fix similar bugs in a much
> simpler way in the future.
>
> When the kernel wants to protect certain MSRs during suspending,
> we simply add a quirk entry in msr_save_dmi_table, and customize
> the MSR registers inside the quirk callback, for example:
>
> u32 msr_id_need_to_save[] = {MSR_ID0, MSR_ID1, MSR_ID2...};
>
> and the quirk mechanism ensures that, once resumed from suspend,
> the MSRs indicated by these IDs will be restored to their
> original, pre-suspend values.
>
> Since both 64-bit and 32-bit kernels are affected, this patch
> covers the common 64/32-bit suspend/resume code path. And
> because the MSRs specified by the user might not be available or
> readable in any situation, we use rdmsrl_safe() to safely save
> these MSRs.
>
> Reported-and-tested-by: Marcin Kaszewski <marcin.kaszewski@...el.com>
> Signed-off-by: Chen Yu <yu.c.chen@...el.com>
> Acked-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>
> Acked-by: Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>
> Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>
> Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
> Cc: Brian Gerst <brgerst@...il.com>
> Cc: Denys Vlasenko <dvlasenk@...hat.com>
> Cc: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@...or.com>
> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
> Cc: bp@...e.de
> Cc: len.brown@...el.com
> Cc: linux@...izon.com
> Cc: luto@...nel.org
> Cc: rjw@...ysocki.net
> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/c9abdcbc173dd2f57e8990e304376f19287e92ba.1448382971.git.yu.c.chen@intel.com
> [ More edits to the naming of data structures. ]
> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
No git id of the patch in Linus's tree, or your signed-off-by?
Sasha, did your scripts trigger this unintentionally somehow?
thanks,
greg k-h
Powered by blists - more mailing lists