linux-kernel - Re: [RESEND PATCH V3 2/8] perf/x86/intel: Basic support for metrics counters

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20190828084416.GC2369@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date:   Wed, 28 Aug 2019 10:44:16 +0200
From:   Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To:     kan.liang@...ux.intel.com
Cc:     acme@...nel.org, mingo@...hat.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        tglx@...utronix.de, jolsa@...nel.org, eranian@...gle.com,
        alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com, ak@...ux.intel.com
Subject: Re: [RESEND PATCH V3 2/8] perf/x86/intel: Basic support for metrics
 counters

On Mon, Aug 26, 2019 at 07:47:34AM -0700, kan.liang@...ux.intel.com wrote:

> diff --git a/arch/x86/events/intel/core.c b/arch/x86/events/intel/core.c
> index 1b2c37ed49db..f4d6335a18e2 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/events/intel/core.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/events/intel/core.c
> @@ -2131,7 +2131,7 @@ static inline void intel_pmu_ack_status(u64 ack)
>  
>  static void intel_pmu_disable_fixed(struct hw_perf_event *hwc)
>  {
> -	int idx = hwc->idx - INTEL_PMC_IDX_FIXED;
> +	int idx = get_reg_idx(hwc->idx) - INTEL_PMC_IDX_FIXED;
>  	u64 ctrl_val, mask;
>  
>  	mask = 0xfULL << (idx * 4);
> @@ -2150,6 +2150,7 @@ static void intel_pmu_disable_event(struct perf_event *event)
>  {
>  	struct hw_perf_event *hwc = &event->hw;
>  	struct cpu_hw_events *cpuc = this_cpu_ptr(&cpu_hw_events);
> +	int reg_idx = get_reg_idx(hwc->idx);
>  
>  	if (unlikely(hwc->idx == INTEL_PMC_IDX_FIXED_BTS)) {
>  		intel_pmu_disable_bts();

It is unfortunate we need that in both cases; and note how the
inconsitent naming.

> @@ -2157,9 +2158,16 @@ static void intel_pmu_disable_event(struct perf_event *event)
>  		return;
>  	}
>  
> -	cpuc->intel_ctrl_guest_mask &= ~(1ull << hwc->idx);
> -	cpuc->intel_ctrl_host_mask &= ~(1ull << hwc->idx);
> -	cpuc->intel_cp_status &= ~(1ull << hwc->idx);
> +	/*
> +	 * When any other topdown events are still enabled,
> +	 * cancel the disabling.
> +	 */
> +	if (has_other_topdown_event(cpuc->active_mask, hwc->idx))
> +		return;

And this includes a 3rd instance of that check :/ Also, this really
wants to be in disable_fixed.

> +
> +	cpuc->intel_ctrl_guest_mask &= ~(1ull << reg_idx);
> +	cpuc->intel_ctrl_host_mask &= ~(1ull << reg_idx);
> +	cpuc->intel_cp_status &= ~(1ull << reg_idx);
>  
>  	if (unlikely(hwc->config_base == MSR_ARCH_PERFMON_FIXED_CTR_CTRL))
>  		intel_pmu_disable_fixed(hwc);

Same for the enable thing.

Let me clean up this mess for you.