[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190828111323.GA5281@sasha-vm>
Date: Wed, 28 Aug 2019 07:13:23 -0400
From: Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
To: Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>
Cc: Yu Chen <yu.c.chen@...el.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
stable-commits@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Patch "x86/pm: Introduce quirk framework to save/restore extra
MSR registers around suspend/resume" has been added to the 4.4-stable tree
On Wed, Aug 28, 2019 at 11:11:55AM +0200, Greg KH wrote:
>On Wed, Aug 28, 2019 at 05:00:44PM +0800, Yu Chen wrote:
>> On Wed, Aug 28, 2019 at 10:43:51AM +0200, Greg KH wrote:
>> > On Wed, Aug 28, 2019 at 12:12:39AM -0400, Sasha Levin wrote:
>> > > This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled
>> > >
>> > > x86/pm: Introduce quirk framework to save/restore extra MSR registers around suspend/resume
>> > >
>> > > to the 4.4-stable tree which can be found at:
>> > > http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git;a=summary
>> > >
>> > > The filename of the patch is:
>> > > x86-pm-introduce-quirk-framework-to-save-restore-ext.patch
>> > > and it can be found in the queue-4.4 subdirectory.
>> > >
>> > > If you, or anyone else, feels it should not be added to the stable tree,
>> > > please let <stable@...r.kernel.org> know about it.
>> > >
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > commit d63273440aa0fdebc30d0c931f15f79beb213134
>> > > Author: Chen Yu <yu.c.chen@...el.com>
>> > > Date: Wed Nov 25 01:03:41 2015 +0800
>> > >
>> > > x86/pm: Introduce quirk framework to save/restore extra MSR registers around suspend/resume
>> > >
>> > > A bug was reported that on certain Broadwell platforms, after
>> > > resuming from S3, the CPU is running at an anomalously low
>> > > speed.
>> > >
>> > > It turns out that the BIOS has modified the value of the
>> > > THERM_CONTROL register during S3, and changed it from 0 to 0x10,
>> > > thus enabled clock modulation(bit4), but with undefined CPU Duty
>> > > Cycle(bit1:3) - which causes the problem.
>> > >
>> > > Here is a simple scenario to reproduce the issue:
>> > >
>> > > 1. Boot up the system
>> > > 2. Get MSR 0x19a, it should be 0
>> > > 3. Put the system into sleep, then wake it up
>> > > 4. Get MSR 0x19a, it shows 0x10, while it should be 0
>> > >
>> > > Although some BIOSen want to change the CPU Duty Cycle during
>> > > S3, in our case we don't want the BIOS to do any modification.
>> > >
>> > > Fix this issue by introducing a more generic x86 framework to
>> > > save/restore specified MSR registers(THERM_CONTROL in this case)
>> > > for suspend/resume. This allows us to fix similar bugs in a much
>> > > simpler way in the future.
>> > >
>> > > When the kernel wants to protect certain MSRs during suspending,
>> > > we simply add a quirk entry in msr_save_dmi_table, and customize
>> > > the MSR registers inside the quirk callback, for example:
>> > >
>> > > u32 msr_id_need_to_save[] = {MSR_ID0, MSR_ID1, MSR_ID2...};
>> > >
>> > > and the quirk mechanism ensures that, once resumed from suspend,
>> > > the MSRs indicated by these IDs will be restored to their
>> > > original, pre-suspend values.
>> > >
>> > > Since both 64-bit and 32-bit kernels are affected, this patch
>> > > covers the common 64/32-bit suspend/resume code path. And
>> > > because the MSRs specified by the user might not be available or
>> > > readable in any situation, we use rdmsrl_safe() to safely save
>> > > these MSRs.
>> > >
>> > > Reported-and-tested-by: Marcin Kaszewski <marcin.kaszewski@...el.com>
>> > > Signed-off-by: Chen Yu <yu.c.chen@...el.com>
>> > > Acked-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>
>> > > Acked-by: Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>
>> > > Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>
>> > > Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
>> > > Cc: Brian Gerst <brgerst@...il.com>
>> > > Cc: Denys Vlasenko <dvlasenk@...hat.com>
>> > > Cc: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@...or.com>
>> > > Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
>> > > Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
>> > > Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
>> > > Cc: bp@...e.de
>> > > Cc: len.brown@...el.com
>> > > Cc: linux@...izon.com
>> > > Cc: luto@...nel.org
>> > > Cc: rjw@...ysocki.net
>> > > Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/c9abdcbc173dd2f57e8990e304376f19287e92ba.1448382971.git.yu.c.chen@intel.com
>> > > [ More edits to the naming of data structures. ]
>> > > Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
>> >
>> > No git id of the patch in Linus's tree, or your signed-off-by?
>> >
>> I think the commit id in Linus'tree should be 7a9c2dd08eadd5c6943115dbbec040c38d2e0822
>
>Ah, and Sasha added it because a later patch needed it :(
>
>Sasha, can you fix this patch's headers up to be in the "proper" format?
Yes, I brought it in as a dependency but cherry picked instead of using
my scripts by mistake. I'll fix up the patch in the queue.
--
Thanks,
Sasha
Powered by blists - more mailing lists