linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] ARC: unwind: Mark expected switch fall-through

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Thu, 29 Aug 2019 11:25:57 +0000
From:   Eugeniy Paltsev <Eugeniy.Paltsev@...opsys.com>
To:     "Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavo@...eddedor.com>
CC:     "linux-snps-arc@...ts.infradead.org" 
        <linux-snps-arc@...ts.infradead.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Vineet Gupta <Vineet.Gupta1@...opsys.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ARC: unwind: Mark expected switch fall-through

Hi Gustavo,

I guess this patch is already sent as a pull request to 'v5.3-rc7' by Vineet:
https://www.mail-archive.com/linux-snps-arc@lists.infradead.org/msg05854.html

---
 Eugeniy Paltsev


________________________________________
From: linux-snps-arc <linux-snps-arc-bounces@...ts.infradead.org> on behalf of Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@...eddedor.com>
Sent: Thursday, August 29, 2019 04:47
To: Vineet Gupta
Cc: linux-snps-arc@...ts.infradead.org; linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ARC: unwind: Mark expected switch fall-through

Hi,

Friendly ping:

Who can take this, please?

Thanks
--
Gustavo

On 8/20/19 8:29 PM, Gustavo A. R. Silva wrote:
> Mark switch cases where we are expecting to fall through.
>
> This patch fixes the following warnings (Building: haps_hs_defconfig arc):
>
> arch/arc/kernel/unwind.c: In function ‘read_pointer’:
> ./include/linux/compiler.h:328:5: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=]
>   do {        \
>      ^
> ./include/linux/compiler.h:338:2: note: in expansion of macro ‘__compiletime_assert’
>   __compiletime_assert(condition, msg, prefix, suffix)
>   ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> ./include/linux/compiler.h:350:2: note: in expansion of macro ‘_compiletime_assert’
>   _compiletime_assert(condition, msg, __compiletime_assert_, __LINE__)
>   ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> ./include/linux/build_bug.h:39:37: note: in expansion of macro ‘compiletime_assert’
>  #define BUILD_BUG_ON_MSG(cond, msg) compiletime_assert(!(cond), msg)
>                                      ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> ./include/linux/build_bug.h:50:2: note: in expansion of macro ‘BUILD_BUG_ON_MSG’
>   BUILD_BUG_ON_MSG(condition, "BUILD_BUG_ON failed: " #condition)
>   ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> arch/arc/kernel/unwind.c:573:3: note: in expansion of macro ‘BUILD_BUG_ON’
>    BUILD_BUG_ON(sizeof(u32) != sizeof(value));
>    ^~~~~~~~~~~~
> arch/arc/kernel/unwind.c:575:2: note: here
>   case DW_EH_PE_native:
>   ^~~~
>
> Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@...eddedor.com>
> ---
>  arch/arc/kernel/unwind.c | 1 +
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arc/kernel/unwind.c b/arch/arc/kernel/unwind.c
> index 445e4d702f43..dc05a63516f5 100644
> --- a/arch/arc/kernel/unwind.c
> +++ b/arch/arc/kernel/unwind.c
> @@ -572,6 +572,7 @@ static unsigned long read_pointer(const u8 **pLoc, const void *end,
>  #else
>               BUILD_BUG_ON(sizeof(u32) != sizeof(value));
>  #endif
> +             /* Fall through */
>       case DW_EH_PE_native:
>               if (end < (const void *)(ptr.pul + 1))
>                       return 0;
>

_______________________________________________
linux-snps-arc mailing list
linux-snps-arc@...ts.infradead.org
https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__lists.infradead.org_mailman_listinfo_linux-2Dsnps-2Darc&d=DwIGaQ&c=DPL6_X_6JkXFx7AXWqB0tg&r=ZlJN1MriPUTkBKCrPSx67GmaplEUGcAEk9yPtCLdUXI&m=GJ6OJTL5qRgb-RdlLBhiFzZH5ZmLXf2lxjuQgwbw7n8&s=1TapZixYsKQRFCCPkofjhki-eZ34KmyqojUdAxceNNA&e=