| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <CAP245DVV=7wfJqQdknoovqarXnHdzZzfhPQCkKxCy+heGrz9Ag@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 29 Aug 2019 18:00:59 +0530
From: Amit Kucheria <amit.kucheria@...aro.org>
To: Stephen Boyd <swboyd@...omium.org>
Cc: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@...el.com>,
Andy Gross <agross@...nel.org>,
Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>,
Eduardo Valentin <edubezval@...il.com>,
linux-arm-msm <linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Marc Gonzalez <marc.w.gonzalez@...e.fr>,
Brian Masney <masneyb@...tation.org>,
Linux PM list <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 15/15] drivers: thermal: tsens: Add interrupt support
On Thu, Aug 29, 2019 at 3:12 AM Stephen Boyd <swboyd@...omium.org> wrote:
>
> Quoting Amit Kucheria (2019-08-27 05:14:11)
> > diff --git a/drivers/thermal/qcom/tsens-common.c b/drivers/thermal/qcom/tsens-common.c
> > index 06b44cfd5eab9..c549f8e1488ba 100644
> > --- a/drivers/thermal/qcom/tsens-common.c
> > +++ b/drivers/thermal/qcom/tsens-common.c
> > @@ -114,6 +146,314 @@ static int tsens_hw_to_mC(struct tsens_sensor *s, int field)
> > return sign_extend32(temp, priv->tempres) * 100;
> > }
> >
> > +/**
> > + * tsens_mC_to_hw - Return correct value to be written to threshold
> > + * registers, whether in ADC code or deciCelsius depending on IP version
>
> Document arguments and return value? Maybe summary can be 'convert
> tsens temperature to hardware register value'?
Fixed.
> > + */
> > +static int tsens_mC_to_hw(struct tsens_sensor *s, int temp)
> > +{
> > + struct tsens_priv *priv = s->priv;
> > +
> > + if (priv->feat->adc) {
> > + /* milliC to C to adc code */
> > + return degc_to_code(temp / 1000, s);
> > + }
> > +
> > + /* milliC to deciC */
> > + return temp / 100;
> > +}
> > +
> > +static inline unsigned int tsens_ver(struct tsens_priv *priv)
>
> Can this return the enum instead of unsigned int?
Fixed.
> > +{
> > + return priv->feat->ver_major;
> > +}
> > +
> > +/**
> > + * tsens_set_interrupt_v1 - Disable an interrupt (enable = false)
> > + * Re-enable an interrupt (enable = true)
> > + */
> > +static void tsens_set_interrupt_v1(struct tsens_priv *priv, u32 hw_id,
> > + enum tsens_irq_type irq_type, bool enable)
> > +{
> > + u32 index;
> > +
> > + if (enable) {
> > + switch (irq_type) {
> > + case UPPER:
> > + index = UP_INT_CLEAR_0 + hw_id;
> > + break;
> > + case LOWER:
> > + index = LOW_INT_CLEAR_0 + hw_id;
> > + break;
> > + }
> > + regmap_field_write(priv->rf[index], 0);
> > + } else {
> > + switch (irq_type) {
> > + case UPPER:
> > + index = UP_INT_CLEAR_0 + hw_id;
> > + break;
> > + case LOWER:
> > + index = LOW_INT_CLEAR_0 + hw_id;
> > + break;
> > + }
> > + regmap_field_write(priv->rf[index], 1);
> > + }
>
> De-dup the switch statement and have
>
> regmap_field_write(priv->rf[index], enable ? 1 : 0);
Fixed.
> > +}
> > +
> > +/**
> > + * tsens_set_interrupt_v2 - Disable an interrupt (enable = false)
> > + * Re-enable an interrupt (enable = true)
> > + */
> > +static void tsens_set_interrupt_v2(struct tsens_priv *priv, u32 hw_id,
> > + enum tsens_irq_type irq_type, bool enable)
> > +{
> > + u32 index_mask, index_clear;
> > +
> > + if (enable) {
> > + switch (irq_type) {
> > + case UPPER:
> > + index_mask = UP_INT_MASK_0 + hw_id;
> > + break;
> > + case LOWER:
> > + index_mask = LOW_INT_MASK_0 + hw_id;
> > + break;
> > + }
> > + regmap_field_write(priv->rf[index_mask], 0);
> > + } else {
> > + /* To disable the interrupt flag for a sensor:
>
> Nitpick: Wrong comment style.
>
Fixed.
> > + * 1. Mask further interrupts for this sensor
> > + * 2. Write 1 followed by 0 to clear the interrupt
> > + */
> > + switch (irq_type) {
> > + case UPPER:
> > + index_mask = UP_INT_MASK_0 + hw_id;
> > + index_clear = UP_INT_CLEAR_0 + hw_id;
> > + break;
> > + case LOWER:
> > + index_mask = LOW_INT_MASK_0 + hw_id;
> > + index_clear = LOW_INT_CLEAR_0 + hw_id;
> > + break;
> > + }
>
> Please extract index_mask and index_clear assignments to one switch
> statement and then change the sequence to an if/else
>
> if (enable) {
> regmap_field_write(priv->rf[index_mask], 1);
> regmap_field_write(priv->rf[index_clear], 1);
> regmap_field_write(priv->rf[index_clear], 0);
> } else {
> regmap_field_write(priv->rf[index_mask], 0);
> }
Fixed.
> > +}
> > +
> > +/**
> > + * tsens_set_interrupt - Disable an interrupt (enable = false)
> > + * Re-enable an interrupt (enable = true)
> > + */
> > +static void tsens_set_interrupt(struct tsens_priv *priv, u32 hw_id,
> > + enum tsens_irq_type irq_type, bool enable)
> > +{
> > + dev_dbg(priv->dev, "[%u] %s: %s -> %s\n", hw_id, __func__,
> > + irq_type ? ((irq_type == 1) ? "UP" : "CRITICAL") : "LOW",
> > + enable ? "en" : "dis");
> > + if (tsens_ver(priv) > VER_1_X)
> > + tsens_set_interrupt_v2(priv, hw_id, irq_type, enable);
> > + else
> > + tsens_set_interrupt_v1(priv, hw_id, irq_type, enable);
> > +}
> > +
> > +/**
> > + * tsens_threshold_violated - Check if a sensor temperature violated a preset threshold
> > + *
>
> Document arguments?
Fixed.
> > + * Return: 0 if threshold was not violated, 1 if it was violated and negative
> > + * errno in case of errors
> > + */
> > +static int tsens_threshold_violated(struct tsens_priv *priv, u32 hw_id,
> > + struct tsens_irq_data *d)
> > +{
> > + int ret;
> > +
> > + ret = regmap_field_read(priv->rf[UPPER_STATUS_0 + hw_id], &d->up_viol);
> > + if (ret)
> > + return ret;
> > + ret = regmap_field_read(priv->rf[LOWER_STATUS_0 + hw_id], &d->low_viol);
> > + if (ret)
> > + return ret;
> > + if (d->up_viol || d->low_viol)
> > + return 1;
> > +
> > + return 0;
> > +}
> > +
> > +static int tsens_read_irq_state(struct tsens_priv *priv, u32 hw_id,
> > + struct tsens_sensor *s, struct tsens_irq_data *d)
> > +{
> > + int ret;
> > +
> > + ret = regmap_field_read(priv->rf[UP_INT_CLEAR_0 + hw_id], &d->up_irq_clear);
> > + if (ret)
> > + return ret;
> > + ret = regmap_field_read(priv->rf[LOW_INT_CLEAR_0 + hw_id], &d->low_irq_clear);
> > + if (ret)
> > + return ret;
> > + if (tsens_ver(priv) > VER_1_X) {
> > + ret = regmap_field_read(priv->rf[UP_INT_MASK_0 + hw_id], &d->up_irq_mask);
> > + if (ret)
> > + return ret;
> > + ret = regmap_field_read(priv->rf[LOW_INT_MASK_0 + hw_id], &d->low_irq_mask);
> > + if (ret)
> > + return ret;
> > + } else {
> > + /* No mask register on older TSENS */
> > + d->up_irq_mask = 0;
> > + d->low_irq_mask = 0;
> > + }
> > +
> > + d->up_thresh = tsens_hw_to_mC(s, UP_THRESH_0 + hw_id);
> > + d->low_thresh = tsens_hw_to_mC(s, LOW_THRESH_0 + hw_id);
> > +
> > + dev_dbg(priv->dev, "[%u] %s%s: status(%u|%u) | clr(%u|%u) | mask(%u|%u)\n",
> > + hw_id, __func__, (d->up_viol || d->low_viol) ? "(V)" : "",
> > + d->low_viol, d->up_viol, d->low_irq_clear, d->up_irq_clear,
> > + d->low_irq_mask, d->up_irq_mask);
> > + dev_dbg(priv->dev, "[%u] %s%s: thresh: (%d:%d)\n", hw_id, __func__,
> > + (d->up_viol || d->low_viol) ? "(violation)" : "",
> > + d->low_thresh, d->up_thresh);
> > +
> > + return 0;
> > +}
> > +
> > +static inline u32 masked_irq(u32 hw_id, u32 mask, enum tsens_ver ver)
> > +{
> > + if (ver > VER_1_X)
> > + return mask & (1 << hw_id);
> > +
> > + /* v1, v0.1 don't have a irq mask register */
> > + return 0;
> > +}
> > +
> > +irqreturn_t tsens_irq_thread(int irq, void *data)
> > +{
> > + struct tsens_priv *priv = data;
> > + struct tsens_irq_data d;
> > + bool enable = true, disable = false;
> > + unsigned long flags;
> > + int temp, ret, i;
> > +
> > + /*
> > + * Check if any sensor raised an IRQ - for each sensor connected to the
> > + * TSENS block if it set the threshold violation bit.
> > + */
> > + for (i = 0; i < priv->num_sensors; i++) {
> > + bool trigger = 0;
>
> How about trigger = false? It's a bool.
Fixed.
> > + struct tsens_sensor *s = &priv->sensor[i];
> > + u32 hw_id = s->hw_id;
> > +
> > + if (IS_ERR(priv->sensor[i].tzd))
> > + continue;
> > + if (!tsens_threshold_violated(priv, hw_id, &d))
> > + continue;
> > + ret = get_temp_tsens_valid(s, &temp);
> > + if (ret) {
> > + dev_err(priv->dev, "[%u] %s: error reading sensor\n", hw_id, __func__);
>
> I hope there isn't an interrupt storm where we're trying to print out
> messages from the irq handler.
>
> > + continue;
> > + }
> > +
> > + spin_lock_irqsave(&priv->ul_lock, flags);
> > +
> > + tsens_read_irq_state(priv, hw_id, s, &d);
> > +
> > + if (d.up_viol &&
> > + !masked_irq(hw_id, d.up_irq_mask, tsens_ver(priv))) {
> > + tsens_set_interrupt(priv, hw_id, UPPER, disable);
> > + if (d.up_thresh > temp) {
> > + dev_dbg(priv->dev, "[%u] %s: re-arm upper\n",
> > + priv->sensor[i].hw_id, __func__);
> > + /* unmask the interrupt for this sensor */
> > + tsens_set_interrupt(priv, hw_id, UPPER, enable);
> > + } else {
> > + trigger = 1;
> > + /* Keep irq masked */
> > + }
> > + } else if (d.low_viol &&
> > + !masked_irq(hw_id, d.low_irq_mask, tsens_ver(priv))) {
> > + tsens_set_interrupt(priv, hw_id, LOWER, disable);
> > + if (d.low_thresh < temp) {
> > + dev_dbg(priv->dev, "[%u] %s: re-arm low\n",
> > + priv->sensor[i].hw_id, __func__);
> > + /* unmask the interrupt for this sensor */
> > + tsens_set_interrupt(priv, hw_id, LOWER, enable);
> > + } else {
> > + trigger = 1;
> > + /* Keep irq masked */
> > + }
> > + }
> > +
> > + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&priv->ul_lock, flags);
> > +
> > + if (trigger) {
> > + dev_dbg(priv->dev, "[%u] %s: TZ update trigger (%d mC)\n",
> > + hw_id, __func__, temp);
> > + thermal_zone_device_update(priv->sensor[i].tzd,
> > + THERMAL_EVENT_UNSPECIFIED);
> > + } else {
> > + dev_dbg(priv->dev, "[%u] %s: no violation: %d\n",
> > + hw_id, __func__, temp);
> > + }
> > + }
> > +
> > + return IRQ_HANDLED;
>
> Should we return IRQ_NONE in the case that the above for loop didn't
> find anything in those if/else-ifs?
The upper/lower interrupts are non-sticky, level-triggered. So if the
temp returns to within the thresholds in the time that a IRQ was
triggered and the handler scheduled, we might not see any threshold
violations/interrupt bits set.
It feels to me that this is a case of the IRQ being handled
(automagically) instead of IRQ_NONE. The definition of IRQ_NONE[1]
also seems to suggest that it should be used when the IRQ wasn't
handled. But it was handled in this case (although, automatically),
wasn't it?
[1] https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/latest/source/include/linux/irqreturn.h#L7
> > +}
> > +
> > +int tsens_set_trips(void *_sensor, int low, int high)
> > +{
> > + struct tsens_sensor *s = _sensor;
> > + struct tsens_priv *priv = s->priv;
> > + struct device *dev = priv->dev;
> > + struct tsens_irq_data d;
> > + unsigned long flags;
> > + int high_val, low_val, cl_high, cl_low;
> > + bool enable = true;
> > + u32 hw_id = s->hw_id;
> > +
> > + dev_dbg(dev, "[%u] %s: proposed thresholds: (%d:%d)\n",
> > + hw_id, __func__, low, high);
> > +
> > + cl_high = clamp_val(high, -40000, 120000);
> > + cl_low = clamp_val(low, -40000, 120000);
> > +
> > + high_val = tsens_mC_to_hw(s, cl_high);
> > + low_val = tsens_mC_to_hw(s, cl_low);
> > +
> > + spin_lock_irqsave(&priv->ul_lock, flags);
> > +
> > + tsens_read_irq_state(priv, hw_id, s, &d);
> > +
> > + /* Write the new thresholds and clear the status */
> > + regmap_field_write(priv->rf[LOW_THRESH_0 + hw_id], low_val);
> > + regmap_field_write(priv->rf[UP_THRESH_0 + hw_id], high_val);
> > + tsens_set_interrupt(priv, hw_id, LOWER, enable);
> > + tsens_set_interrupt(priv, hw_id, UPPER, enable);
>
> Just pass true? Why is there an enable local variable?
Good catch. Left over from a refactor with more convoluted logic.
> > +
> > + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&priv->ul_lock, flags);
> > +
> > + dev_dbg(dev, "[%u] %s: (%d:%d)->(%d:%d)\n",
> > + s->hw_id, __func__, d.low_thresh, d.up_thresh, cl_low, cl_high);
> > +
> > + return 0;
> > +}
> > +
> [...]
> > @@ -319,28 +659,31 @@ int __init init_common(struct tsens_priv *priv)
> > ret = PTR_ERR(priv->rf[SENSOR_EN]);
> > goto err_put_device;
> > }
> > - /* now alloc regmap_fields in tm_map */
> > - for (i = 0, j = LAST_TEMP_0; i < priv->feat->max_sensors; i++, j++) {
> > - priv->rf[j] = devm_regmap_field_alloc(dev, priv->tm_map,
> > - priv->fields[j]);
> > - if (IS_ERR(priv->rf[j])) {
> > - ret = PTR_ERR(priv->rf[j]);
> > - goto err_put_device;
> > - }
> > + priv->rf[INT_EN] = devm_regmap_field_alloc(dev, priv->tm_map,
> > + priv->fields[INT_EN]);
> > + if (IS_ERR(priv->rf[INT_EN])) {
> > + ret = PTR_ERR(priv->rf[INT_EN]);
> > + goto err_put_device;
> > }
> >
> > - /* Save away resolution of signed temperature value for this IP */
> > - priv->tempres = priv->fields[LAST_TEMP_0].msb - priv->fields[LAST_TEMP_0].lsb;
> > -
> > - for (i = 0, j = VALID_0; i < priv->feat->max_sensors; i++, j++) {
> > - priv->rf[j] = devm_regmap_field_alloc(dev, priv->tm_map,
> > - priv->fields[j]);
> > - if (IS_ERR(priv->rf[j])) {
> > - ret = PTR_ERR(priv->rf[j]);
> > - goto err_put_device;
> > + /* This loop might need changes if enum regfield_ids is reordered */
> > + for (j = LAST_TEMP_0; j <= UP_THRESH_15; j += 16) {
> > + for (i = 0; i < priv->feat->max_sensors; i++) {
> > + int idx = j + i;
> > +
> > + priv->rf[idx] = devm_regmap_field_alloc(dev, priv->tm_map,
> > + priv->fields[idx]);
> > + if (IS_ERR(priv->rf[idx])) {
> > + ret = PTR_ERR(priv->rf[idx]);
> > + goto err_put_device;
> > + }
> > }
> > }
> > + /* Save away resolution of signed temperature value for this IP */
> > + priv->tempres = priv->fields[LAST_TEMP_0].msb - priv->fields[LAST_TEMP_0].lsb;
>
> Leave this where it was, i.e. before the for loop? Or is that a bug and
> it doesn't actually work unless it's after the for loop? In which case,
> this should go to the previous patch.
I've gotten rid of this completely now.
> >
> > + spin_lock_init(&priv->ul_lock);
> > + tsens_enable_irq(priv);
> > tsens_debug_init(op);
> >
> > return 0;
> > diff --git a/drivers/thermal/qcom/tsens.c b/drivers/thermal/qcom/tsens.c
> > index 772aa76b50e12..a4335717aeede 100644
> > --- a/drivers/thermal/qcom/tsens.c
> > +++ b/drivers/thermal/qcom/tsens.c
> > @@ -96,7 +99,33 @@ static int tsens_register(struct tsens_priv *priv)
> > if (priv->ops->enable)
> > priv->ops->enable(priv, i);
> > }
> > +
> > + pdev = of_find_device_by_node(priv->dev->of_node);
> > + if (!pdev) {
> > + dev_err(&pdev->dev, "%s: device node not found in DT\n", __func__);
>
> Do we really need this? Maybe just bail out in silence because this
> should never happen?
Fixed.
> > + return -ENODEV;
> > + }
> > +
> > + irq = platform_get_irq_byname(pdev, "uplow");
> > + if (irq < 0) {
> > + dev_err(&pdev->dev, "%s: missing irq in dt: uplow\n", __func__);
>
> You can drop the error print. I upstreamed a change to print the error
> generically in the core.
Fixed.
> > + return irq;
>
> Did we need to put_device() here?
Refactored to goto err_put_device
> > + }
> > +
> > + ret = devm_request_threaded_irq(&pdev->dev, irq,
> > + NULL, tsens_irq_thread,
> > + IRQF_TRIGGER_HIGH | IRQF_ONESHOT,
> > + dev_name(&pdev->dev), priv);
> > + if (ret) {
> > + dev_err(&pdev->dev, "%s: failed to get irq\n", __func__);
> > + goto err_put_device;
> > + }
> > + enable_irq_wake(irq);
> > return 0;
> > +
> > +err_put_device:
> > + put_device(&pdev->dev);
> > + return ret;
Powered by blists - more mailing lists