[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190829151912.z6cflsaox2qnmqxw@holly.lan>
Date: Thu, 29 Aug 2019 16:19:12 +0100
From: Daniel Thompson <daniel.thompson@...aro.org>
To: Amit Kucheria <amit.kucheria@...aro.org>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-arm-msm <linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org>,
Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>,
Eduardo Valentin <edubezval@...il.com>,
Andy Gross <agross@...nel.org>,
Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>,
Brian Masney <masneyb@...tation.org>,
Marc Gonzalez <marc.w.gonzalez@...e.fr>,
Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@...el.com>,
Linux PM list <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 03/15] drivers: thermal: tsens: Add __func__
identifier to debug statements
On Thu, Aug 29, 2019 at 07:58:45PM +0530, Amit Kucheria wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 29, 2019 at 7:35 PM Daniel Thompson
> <daniel.thompson@...aro.org> wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, Aug 27, 2019 at 05:43:59PM +0530, Amit Kucheria wrote:
> > > Printing the function name when enabling debugging makes logs easier to
> > > read.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Amit Kucheria <amit.kucheria@...aro.org>
> > > Reviewed-by: Stephen Boyd <swboyd@...omium.org>
> > > Reviewed-by: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>
> >
> > This should need to be manually added at each call site; it is already
> > built into the logging system (the f flag for dynamic debug)?
>
> I assume you meant "shouldn't".
Quite so. Sorry about that.
> I haven't yet integrated dynamic debug into my daily workflow.
>
> Last time I looked at it, it was a bit bothersome to use because I
> needed to lookup exact line numbers to trigger useful information. And
> those line numbers constantly keep changing as I work on the driver,
> so it was a bit painful to script. Not to mention the syntax to frob
> the correct files in debugfs to enable this functionality.
>
> As opposed to this, adding the following to the makefile is so easy. :-)
>
> CFLAGS_tsens-common.o := -DDEBUG
>
> Perhaps I am using it all wrong? How would I go about using dynamic
> debug instead of this patch?
Throwing dyndbg="file <fname>.c +pf" onto the kernel command line is a
good start (+p enables debug level prints, +f causes messages to include
the function name).
When the C files map to module names (whether the modules are actually
built-in or not) then <module>.dyndbg=+pf is a bit cleaner and allows
you to debug the whole of a driver without how it is decomposed into
files.
There are (many) other controls to play with[1] but the above should be
sufficient to simulate -DDEBUG .
Daniel.
[1]
https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/admin-guide/dynamic-debug-howto.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists