linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH V3 2/6] dt-bindings: PCI: tegra: Add PCIe slot supplies regulator entries

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <cd106d64-e06c-e7a2-d807-f5f080625363@nvidia.com>
Date:   Thu, 29 Aug 2019 20:48:39 +0530
From:   Vidya Sagar <vidyas@...dia.com>
To:     Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>
CC:     <lorenzo.pieralisi@....com>, <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
        <robh+dt@...nel.org>, <jonathanh@...dia.com>,
        <andrew.murray@....com>, <kishon@...com>,
        <gustavo.pimentel@...opsys.com>, <digetx@...il.com>,
        <mperttunen@...dia.com>, <linux-pci@...r.kernel.org>,
        <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org>,
        <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>, <kthota@...dia.com>,
        <mmaddireddy@...dia.com>, <sagar.tv@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V3 2/6] dt-bindings: PCI: tegra: Add PCIe slot supplies
 regulator entries

On 8/29/2019 5:33 PM, Thierry Reding wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 28, 2019 at 10:58:46PM +0530, Vidya Sagar wrote:
>> Add optional bindings "vpcie3v3-supply" and "vpcie12v-supply" to describe
>> regulators of a PCIe slot's supplies 3.3V and 12V provided the platform
>> is designed to have regulator controlled slot supplies.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Vidya Sagar <vidyas@...dia.com>
>> ---
>> V3:
>> * None
>>
>> V2:
>> * None
>>
>>   .../devicetree/bindings/pci/nvidia,tegra194-pcie.txt      | 8 ++++++++
>>   1 file changed, 8 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pci/nvidia,tegra194-pcie.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pci/nvidia,tegra194-pcie.txt
>> index 0ac1b867ac24..b739f92da58e 100644
>> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pci/nvidia,tegra194-pcie.txt
>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pci/nvidia,tegra194-pcie.txt
>> @@ -104,6 +104,12 @@ Optional properties:
>>      specified in microseconds
>>   - nvidia,aspm-l0s-entrance-latency-us: ASPM L0s entrance latency to be
>>      specified in microseconds
>> +- vpcie3v3-supply: A phandle to the regulator node that supplies 3.3V to the slot
>> +  if the platform has one such slot. (Ex:- x16 slot owned by C5 controller
>> +  in p2972-0000 platform).
>> +- vpcie12v-supply: A phandle to the regulator node that supplies 12V to the slot
>> +  if the platform has one such slot. (Ex:- x16 slot owned by C5 controller
>> +  in p2972-0000 platform).
> 
> There's an ongoing discussion regarding the use of optional power
> supplies and I'm wondering if we're not abusing this here. Why exactly
> are these regulators optional?
I made them optional because, the number and type of supplies typically depend on the
kind of slot the controller is owning. If it is a CEM slot, then, it needs 3.3V & 12V
supplies and if it is an M.2 Key-E/M slot, it needs only 3.3V supply. Also, if there are
on-board PCIe endpoint devices, supplies may vary again from vendor to vendor.
Considering all these, I made them optional instead of mandatory.
Also, I agree that regulator framework supplies a dummy regulator if we make them mandatory
but doesn't supply one, but it does so with a warning print in the log which I feel is
an unwanted alert and to avoid that one has to supply dummy/fixed regulators which again
seems an overkill when all of this can be addressed by making slot regulators optional.

> 
> The distinction is somewhat subtle, but the other way to look at
> modelling this in DT is that the supplies are in fact required, but may
> be connected to an always-on regulator with a fixed voltage. Or in some
> cases they may also be shorted to ground. In both cases the PCI
> controller, or rather the slot that the controller connects to, actually
> "requires" the supplies, it's just that we can get away without
> describing them because they can't be controlled anyway.
> 
> Looking at the PCI connector pinout for PCI Express, I do see a bunch of
> +3.3 V and +12 V pins. To me that indicates that the 3.3 V and 12 V
> supplies are indeed required for PCI slots. I'm not sure about devices
> that are directly connected to the PCI controller, though. I'll need to
> go look at some schematics to get a better understanding of these.
> 
> Bottom line: I'm wondering if we shouldn't really make these supplies
> mandatory and in case where we don't care either just leave them away
> (the regulator framework will supply a dummy regulator in that case) or
> hook them up to a fixed regulator if that matches the hardware design.
> 
> Any thoughts?
> 
> Thierry
> 
>>   
>>   Examples:
>>   =========
>> @@ -156,6 +162,8 @@ Tegra194:
>>   			  0xc2000000 0x18 0x00000000 0x18 0x00000000 0x4 0x00000000>;  /* prefetchable memory (16GB) */
>>   
>>   		vddio-pex-ctl-supply = <&vdd_1v8ao>;
>> +		vpcie3v3-supply = <&vdd_3v3_pcie>;
>> +		vpcie12v-supply = <&vdd_12v_pcie>;
>>   
>>   		phys = <&p2u_hsio_2>, <&p2u_hsio_3>, <&p2u_hsio_4>,
>>   		       <&p2u_hsio_5>;
>> -- 
>> 2.17.1
>>