[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <BYAPR12MB2710B0F6F5630BF0BE7B4663B3BD0@BYAPR12MB2710.namprd12.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Fri, 30 Aug 2019 18:35:23 +0000
From: Krishna Reddy <vdumpa@...dia.com>
To: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@....com>
CC: Sachin Nikam <Snikam@...dia.com>,
"Thomas Zeng (SW-TEGRA)" <thomasz@...dia.com>,
Juha Tukkinen <jtukkinen@...dia.com>,
Mikko Perttunen <mperttunen@...dia.com>,
Pritesh Raithatha <praithatha@...dia.com>,
"iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org" <iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Timo Alho <talho@...dia.com>, Yu-Huan Hsu <YHsu@...dia.com>,
"linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org" <linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org>,
Thierry Reding <treding@...dia.com>,
Alexander Van Brunt <avanbrunt@...dia.com>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"will.deacon@....com" <will.deacon@....com>,
"joro@...tes.org" <joro@...tes.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH 6/7] arm64: tegra: Add DT node for T194 SMMU
>The number of global interrupts has never been related to the number of context interrupts :/
Yeah, They are not related. I was trying to use minimum irq entries in the DT node as they both would achieve the same functionality.
>Clearly you have one combined interrupt output per SMMU - describing those as one global interrupt and the first two context bank interrupts respectively makes far less sense than calling them 3 global interrupts, not least because the latter is strictly true.
Will update to 3 in next patch to make it better for readability.
-KR
Powered by blists - more mailing lists