[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <BYAPR12MB27102584FA929CBD92002DD9B3BD0@BYAPR12MB2710.namprd12.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Fri, 30 Aug 2019 18:39:56 +0000
From: Krishna Reddy <vdumpa@...dia.com>
To: Mikko Perttunen <cyndis@...si.fi>
CC: "linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org" <iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org" <linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org>,
Thierry Reding <treding@...dia.com>,
"Yu-Huan Hsu" <YHsu@...dia.com>, Sachin Nikam <Snikam@...dia.com>,
Pritesh Raithatha <praithatha@...dia.com>,
Timo Alho <talho@...dia.com>,
Alexander Van Brunt <avanbrunt@...dia.com>,
"Thomas Zeng (SW-TEGRA)" <thomasz@...dia.com>,
"olof@...om.net" <olof@...om.net>,
Juha Tukkinen <jtukkinen@...dia.com>,
Mikko Perttunen <mperttunen@...dia.com>,
"will.deacon@....com" <will.deacon@....com>,
"joro@...tes.org" <joro@...tes.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH 6/7] arm64: tegra: Add DT node for T194 SMMU
>> + smmu: iommu@...00000 {
>> + compatible = "nvidia,smmu-v2";
>Should we have a compatibility string like "nvidia,tegra194-smmu" so that we can have other chips with SMMUv2 that could be different?
As pointed by Robin as well, as Nvidia hasn't modified ARM MMU-500 implementation, we can update it to specific chip based.
Let me update.
-KR
Powered by blists - more mailing lists