[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <BYAPR12MB27106FD6B6CC9E148B65EC00B3BD0@BYAPR12MB2710.namprd12.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Fri, 30 Aug 2019 19:16:34 +0000
From: Krishna Reddy <vdumpa@...dia.com>
To: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>
CC: "linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org" <iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org" <linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org>,
Thierry Reding <treding@...dia.com>,
"Yu-Huan Hsu" <YHsu@...dia.com>, Sachin Nikam <Snikam@...dia.com>,
Pritesh Raithatha <praithatha@...dia.com>,
Timo Alho <talho@...dia.com>,
Alexander Van Brunt <avanbrunt@...dia.com>,
"Thomas Zeng (SW-TEGRA)" <thomasz@...dia.com>,
"olof@...om.net" <olof@...om.net>,
Juha Tukkinen <jtukkinen@...dia.com>,
Mikko Perttunen <mperttunen@...dia.com>,
Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@....com>,
"will.deacon@....com" <will.deacon@....com>,
"joro@...tes.org" <joro@...tes.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH 4/7] iommu/arm-smmu: Add global/context fault
implementation hooks
>> +static irqreturn_t nsmmu_context_fault_inst(int irq,
>> + struct arm_smmu_device *smmu,
>> + int idx, int inst);
>More of these signed integers that could be unsigned. Also why the need to predeclare this? Can you not just put the definition of the function up here?
The singed integers are based on original function prototype from arm-smmu.c. inst can be updated to unsigned.
This is because I was checking context faults from global fault handler as well. This can avoided by using interrupt lines of all the instances across global and context irq entries. Let me update.
> + if (smmu->impl->global_fault)
> + return smmu->impl->global_fault(irq, smmu);
>>... and here about the extra level of indirection.
Fixing in next version.
-KR
Powered by blists - more mailing lists