[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <BYAPR12MB271010C629D8DD7AEC0123D4B3BD0@BYAPR12MB2710.namprd12.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Fri, 30 Aug 2019 22:49:21 +0000
From: Krishna Reddy <vdumpa@...dia.com>
To: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@....com>
CC: Sachin Nikam <Snikam@...dia.com>,
"Thomas Zeng (SW-TEGRA)" <thomasz@...dia.com>,
Juha Tukkinen <jtukkinen@...dia.com>,
Mikko Perttunen <mperttunen@...dia.com>,
Pritesh Raithatha <praithatha@...dia.com>,
"iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org" <iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Timo Alho <talho@...dia.com>, Yu-Huan Hsu <YHsu@...dia.com>,
"linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org" <linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org>,
Thierry Reding <treding@...dia.com>,
Alexander Van Brunt <avanbrunt@...dia.com>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"will.deacon@....com" <will.deacon@....com>,
"joro@...tes.org" <joro@...tes.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH 3/7] iommu/arm-smmu: Add tlb_sync implementation hook
>> + if (smmu->impl->tlb_sync) {
>> + smmu->impl->tlb_sync(smmu, page, sync, status);
>What I'd hoped is that rather than needing a hook for this, you could just override smmu_domain->tlb_ops from .init_context to wire up the alternate .sync method directly. That would save this extra level of indirection.
Hi Robin, overriding tlb_ops->tlb_sync function is not enough here.
There are direct references to arm_smmu_tlb_sync_context(), arm_smmu_tlb_sync_global() functions.
In arm-smmu.c. we can replace these direct references with tlb_ops->tlb_sync() function except in one function arm_smmu_device_reset().
When arm_smmu_device_reset() gets called, domains are not initialized and tlb_ops is not available.
Should we add a new hook for arm_smmu_tlb_sync_global() or make this as a responsibility of impl->reset() hook as it gets
called at the same place?
-KR
Powered by blists - more mailing lists