[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAK8P3a2XzubLT4gkAzmu9u17bXB1dznbZm=vGPAzyS74fNa=Kg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 30 Aug 2019 22:32:51 +0200
From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
To: Michal Suchanek <msuchanek@...e.de>
Cc: Linux FS-devel Mailing List <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>,
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>,
Alexander Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Christian Brauner <christian@...uner.io>,
Allison Randal <allison@...utok.net>,
Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@...ibm.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Firoz Khan <firoz.khan@...aro.org>,
linuxppc-dev <linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re:
On Fri, Aug 30, 2019 at 10:30 PM Michal Suchanek <msuchanek@...e.de> wrote:
>
> Subject: [PATCH] powerpc: Add back __ARCH_WANT_SYS_LLSEEK macro
>
> This partially reverts commit caf6f9c8a326 ("asm-generic: Remove
> unneeded __ARCH_WANT_SYS_LLSEEK macro")
>
> When CONFIG_COMPAT is disabled on ppc64 the kernel does not build.
>
> There is resistance to both removing the llseek syscall from the 64bit
> syscall tables and building the llseek interface unconditionally.
>
> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20190828151552.GA16855@infradead.org/
> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20190829214319.498c7de2@naga/
>
> Signed-off-by: Michal Suchanek <msuchanek@...e.de>
Reviewed-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists