lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20190830.133335.323827182628557013.davem@davemloft.net>
Date:   Fri, 30 Aug 2019 13:33:35 -0700 (PDT)
From:   David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:     zdai@...ux.vnet.ibm.com
Cc:     xiyou.wangcong@...il.com, jhs@...atatu.com, jiri@...nulli.us,
        netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        zdai@...ibm.com
Subject: Re: [v2] net_sched: act_police: add 2 new attributes to support
 police 64bit rate and peakrate

From: "David Z. Dai" <zdai@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date: Fri, 30 Aug 2019 15:03:52 -0500

> I have the impression that last parameter num value should be larger
> than the attribute num value in 2nd parameter (TC_POLICE_RATE64 in this
> case).

The argument in question is explicitly the "padding" value.

Please explain in detail where you got the impression that the
argument has to be larger?

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ