[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <faf7b7e8-48b0-ba58-51e6-cb6a5ee44dfc@kernel.org>
Date: Fri, 30 Aug 2019 15:26:50 +0100
From: Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>
To: Lubomir Rintel <lkundrak@...sk>, Olof Johansson <olof@...om.net>
Cc: Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Jason Cooper <jason@...edaemon.net>,
Kishon Vijay Abraham I <kishon@...com>,
Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>,
Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-clk@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 00/20] Initial support for Marvell MMP3 SoC
On 26/08/2019 12:59, Lubomir Rintel wrote:
> On Fri, 2019-08-23 at 10:42 +0100, Marc Zyngier wrote:
>> On 23/08/2019 08:21, Lubomir Rintel wrote:
>>> On Thu, 2019-08-22 at 11:31 +0100, Marc Zyngier wrote:
>>>> On 22/08/2019 10:26, Lubomir Rintel wrote:
>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>
>>>>> this is a second spin of a patch set that adds support for the Marvell
>>>>> MMP3 processor. MMP3 is used in OLPC XO-4 laptops, Panasonic Toughpad
>>>>> FZ-A1 tablet and Dell Wyse 3020 Tx0D thin clients.
>>>>>
>>>>> Compared to v1, there's a handful of fixes in response to reviews. Patch
>>>>> 02/20 is new. Details in individual patches.
>>>>>
>>>>> Apart from the adjustments in mach-mmp/, the patch makes necessary
>>>>> changes to the irqchip driver and adds an USB2 PHY driver. The latter
>>>>> has a dependency on the mach-mmp/ changes, so it can't be submitted
>>>>> separately.
>>>>>
>>>>> The patch set has been tested to work on Wyse Tx0D and not ruin MMP2
>>>>> support on XO-1.75.
>>>>
>>>> How do you want this series to be merged? I'm happy to take the irqchip
>>>> related patches as well as the corresponding DT change (once reviewed)
>>>> through my tree.
>>>
>>> I was hoping for the Arm SoC tree, because there are some dependencies
>>> (MMP3 USB PHY depends on MMP3 SoC).
>>>
>>> That said, the irqchip patches are rather independent and the only
>>> downside of them going in via a different tree will be that the other
>>> tree that will lack them won't boot on MMP3 (things will compile
>>> though). I don't know if that's okay. What's typically done in cases
>>> like these?
>>
>> I usually take the irqchip patches that can be built standalone (without
>> dependency on header files, for example). If you want them to go via
>> another tree, stick my
>>
>> Acked-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>
>>
>> on patches #6 through #9.
>
> Actually, please go ahead and pick the irqchip patches into your tree.
>
> The rest of the patch set may need a couple more spins, and it will be
> nice if it gets shorter.
Applied to irqchip-next.
M.
--
Jazz is not dead, it just smells funny...
Powered by blists - more mailing lists