[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190830142841.GA20@mellanox.com>
Date: Fri, 30 Aug 2019 14:28:47 +0000
From: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...lanox.com>
To: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
CC: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>,
Minchan Kim <minchan@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the akpm-current tree
On Fri, Aug 30, 2019 at 11:55:30PM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Caused by commit
>
> 1c8999b3963d ("mm: introduce MADV_COLD")
> (and following commits)
>
> interacting with commit
>
> 923bfc561e75 ("pagewalk: separate function pointers from iterator data")
>
> from the hmm tree.
Yes, this is expected thanks
> diff --git a/mm/madvise.c b/mm/madvise.c
> index 7ec7c8f6d5ab..20598df8360a 100644
> --- a/mm/madvise.c
> +++ b/mm/madvise.c
> @@ -446,6 +446,10 @@ static int madvise_cold_or_pageout_pte_range(pmd_t *pmd,
> return 0;
> }
>
> +static const struct mm_walk_ops cold_walk_ops = {
> + .pmd_entry = madvise_cold_or_pageout_pte_range,
> +};
> +
> +static const struct mm_walk_ops pageout_walk_ops = {
> + .pmd_entry = madvise_cold_or_pageout_pte_range,
> +};
These two can be shared
Looks OK otherwise
Jason
Powered by blists - more mailing lists