linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v4 09/11] lib/vsprintf: OF nodes are first and foremost, struct device

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20190902102121.GD2680@smile.fi.intel.com>
Date:   Mon, 2 Sep 2019 13:21:21 +0300
From:   Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
To:     Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@...ux.intel.com>
Cc:     Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        rafael@...nel.org, linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org,
        devicetree@...r.kernel.org, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
        Heikki Krogerus <heikki.krogerus@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 09/11] lib/vsprintf: OF nodes are first and foremost,
 struct device_nodes

On Mon, Sep 02, 2019 at 11:32:38AM +0300, Sakari Ailus wrote:
> Factor out static kobject_string() function that simply calls
> device_node_string(), and thus remove references to kobjects (as these are
> struct device_node).
> 

FWIW,
Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>

> Signed-off-by: Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@...ux.intel.com>
> ---
>  lib/vsprintf.c | 16 ++++------------
>  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/lib/vsprintf.c b/lib/vsprintf.c
> index a04a2167101ef..4ad9332d54ba6 100644
> --- a/lib/vsprintf.c
> +++ b/lib/vsprintf.c
> @@ -1905,6 +1905,9 @@ char *device_node_string(char *buf, char *end, struct device_node *dn,
>  	struct printf_spec str_spec = spec;
>  	str_spec.field_width = -1;
>  
> +	if (fmt[0] != 'F')
> +		return error_string(buf, end, "(%pO?)", spec);
> +
>  	if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_OF))
>  		return error_string(buf, end, "(%pOF?)", spec);
>  
> @@ -1978,17 +1981,6 @@ char *device_node_string(char *buf, char *end, struct device_node *dn,
>  	return widen_string(buf, buf - buf_start, end, spec);
>  }
>  
> -static char *kobject_string(char *buf, char *end, void *ptr,
> -			    struct printf_spec spec, const char *fmt)
> -{
> -	switch (fmt[1]) {
> -	case 'F':
> -		return device_node_string(buf, end, ptr, spec, fmt + 1);
> -	}
> -
> -	return error_string(buf, end, "(%pO?)", spec);
> -}
> -
>  /*
>   * Show a '%p' thing.  A kernel extension is that the '%p' is followed
>   * by an extra set of alphanumeric characters that are extended format
> @@ -2167,7 +2159,7 @@ char *pointer(const char *fmt, char *buf, char *end, void *ptr,
>  	case 'G':
>  		return flags_string(buf, end, ptr, spec, fmt);
>  	case 'O':
> -		return kobject_string(buf, end, ptr, spec, fmt);
> +		return device_node_string(buf, end, ptr, spec, fmt + 1);
>  	case 'x':
>  		return pointer_string(buf, end, ptr, spec);
>  	}
> -- 
> 2.20.1
> 

-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko