[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190902122627.GG2680@smile.fi.intel.com>
Date: Mon, 2 Sep 2019 15:26:27 +0300
From: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
To: Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
rafael@...nel.org, linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
Heikki Krogerus <heikki.krogerus@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 11/11] lib/test_printf: Add tests for %pfw printk
modifier
On Mon, Sep 02, 2019 at 11:32:40AM +0300, Sakari Ailus wrote:
> Add a test for the %pfw printk modifier using software nodes.
> + const struct software_node softnodes[] = {
> + { .name = "first", },
> + { .name = "second", .parent = &softnodes[0], },
> + { .name = "third", .parent = &softnodes[1], },
> + { NULL /* Guardian */ },
> + };
> + test(full_name_second, "%pfw",
> + software_node_fwnode(&softnodes[ARRAY_SIZE(softnodes) - 3]));
> + test(full_name, "%pfw",
> + software_node_fwnode(&softnodes[ARRAY_SIZE(softnodes) - 2]));
> + test(full_name, "%pfwf",
> + software_node_fwnode(&softnodes[ARRAY_SIZE(softnodes) - 2]));
> + test(second_name, "%pfwP",
> + software_node_fwnode(&softnodes[ARRAY_SIZE(softnodes) - 3]));
> + test(third_name, "%pfwP",
> + software_node_fwnode(&softnodes[ARRAY_SIZE(softnodes) - 2]));
These can be shorted and easier to parse if you use absolute indexes.
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
Powered by blists - more mailing lists