linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] staging: exfat: cleanup braces for if/else statements

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 4 Sep 2019 19:05:42 +0200
From:   Valentin Vidić <vvidic@...entin-vidic.from.hr>
To:     David Laight <David.Laight@...LAB.COM>
Cc:     Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
        Valdis Kletnieks <valdis.kletnieks@...edu>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        "devel@...verdev.osuosl.org" <devel@...verdev.osuosl.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] staging: exfat: cleanup braces for if/else statements

On Wed, Sep 04, 2019 at 09:38:55AM +0000, David Laight wrote:
> From: Valentin Vidic
> > Sent: 03 September 2019 19:12
> > On Tue, Sep 03, 2019 at 06:32:49PM +0100, Al Viro wrote:
> > > On Tue, Sep 03, 2019 at 06:47:32PM +0200, Valentin Vidic wrote:
> > > > +			} else if (uni == 0xFFFF) {
> > > >  				skip = TRUE;
> > >
> > > While we are at it, could you get rid of that 'TRUE' macro?
> > 
> > Sure, but maybe in a separate patch since TRUE/FALSE has more
> > calls than just this.
> 
> I bet you can get rid of the 'skip' variable and simplify the code
> by using continue/break/return (or maybe goto).

Seems it is not so simple - the value of skip is used to control the
behavior in the next loop iteration based on the current uni value.
So maybe just replace skip with a less confusing name.

-- 
Valentin