linux-kernel - RE: [PATCH] staging: exfat: cleanup braces for if/else statements

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 4 Sep 2019 09:38:55 +0000
From:   David Laight <David.Laight@...LAB.COM>
To:     'Valentin Vidić' 
        <vvidic@...entin-vidic.from.hr>, Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>
CC:     Valdis Kletnieks <valdis.kletnieks@...edu>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        "devel@...verdev.osuosl.org" <devel@...verdev.osuosl.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH] staging: exfat: cleanup braces for if/else statements

From: Valentin Vidic
> Sent: 03 September 2019 19:12
> On Tue, Sep 03, 2019 at 06:32:49PM +0100, Al Viro wrote:
> > On Tue, Sep 03, 2019 at 06:47:32PM +0200, Valentin Vidic wrote:
> > > +			} else if (uni == 0xFFFF) {
> > >  				skip = TRUE;
> >
> > While we are at it, could you get rid of that 'TRUE' macro?
> 
> Sure, but maybe in a separate patch since TRUE/FALSE has more
> calls than just this.

I bet you can get rid of the 'skip' variable and simplify the code
by using continue/break/return (or maybe goto).

	David

-
Registered Address Lakeside, Bramley Road, Mount Farm, Milton Keynes, MK1 1PT, UK
Registration No: 1397386 (Wales)