linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 2/3] iommu/pamu: Use kzfree rather than its implementation

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <5D6F8606.8030109@huawei.com>
Date:   Wed, 4 Sep 2019 17:38:14 +0800
From:   zhong jiang <zhongjiang@...wei.com>
To:     Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>
CC:     <davem@...emloft.net>, <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>,
        <arno@...isbad.org>, <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        <iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org>, <linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org>,
        <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] iommu/pamu: Use kzfree rather than its implementation

On 2019/9/4 16:15, Joerg Roedel wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 04, 2019 at 11:01:18AM +0800, zhong jiang wrote:
>> Use kzfree instead of memset() + kfree().
>>
>> Signed-off-by: zhong jiang <zhongjiang@...wei.com>
>> ---
>>  drivers/iommu/fsl_pamu.c | 6 ++----
>>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/iommu/fsl_pamu.c b/drivers/iommu/fsl_pamu.c
>> index cde281b..ca6d147 100644
>> --- a/drivers/iommu/fsl_pamu.c
>> +++ b/drivers/iommu/fsl_pamu.c
>> @@ -1174,10 +1174,8 @@ static int fsl_pamu_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>>  	if (irq != NO_IRQ)
>>  		free_irq(irq, data);
>>  
>> -	if (data) {
>> -		memset(data, 0, sizeof(struct pamu_isr_data));
>> -		kfree(data);
>> -	}
>> +	if (data)
>> +		kzfree(data);
> kzfree() is doing its own NULL-ptr check, no need to do it here.
Yep,   we should also remove the condition before kzfree.  will repost.

Thanks,
zhong jiang
> Regards,
>
> 	Joerg