[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.21.9999.1909041420270.13502@viisi.sifive.com>
Date: Wed, 4 Sep 2019 14:22:18 -0700 (PDT)
From: Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@...ive.com>
To: Mao Han <han_mao@...ky.com>
cc: linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-csky@...r.kernel.org, Greentime Hu <green.hu@...il.com>,
Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@...ive.com>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>, Guo Ren <guoren@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V6 2/3] riscv: Add support for perf registers sampling
Hello Mao Han,
On Thu, 29 Aug 2019, Mao Han wrote:
> This patch implements the perf registers sampling and validation API
> for riscv arch. The valid registers and their register ID are defined in
> perf_regs.h. Perf tool can backtrace in userspace with unwind library
> and the registers/user stack dump support.
[ ... ]
> diff --git a/arch/riscv/include/uapi/asm/perf_regs.h b/arch/riscv/include/uapi/asm/perf_regs.h
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000..df1a581
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/arch/riscv/include/uapi/asm/perf_regs.h
> @@ -0,0 +1,42 @@
> +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 */
All of the other Linux architectures use "GPL-2.0 WITH Linux-syscall-note"
for their license for the perf uapi files. Could you please change this
license string to match the standard Linux practice? Then I think it
should be good to merge.
- Paul
Powered by blists - more mailing lists