linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3] watchdog: qcom: support pre-timeout when the bark irq is available

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20190905183456.GA29500@roeck-us.net>
Date:   Thu, 5 Sep 2019 11:34:56 -0700
From:   Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
To:     Jorge Ramirez-Ortiz <jorge.ramirez-ortiz@...aro.org>
Cc:     bjorn.andersson@...aro.org, agross@...nel.org,
        wim@...ux-watchdog.org, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-watchdog@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] watchdog: qcom: support pre-timeout when the bark irq
 is available

On Thu, Sep 05, 2019 at 08:24:19PM +0200, Jorge Ramirez-Ortiz wrote:
> Use the bark interrupt as the pre-timeout notifier whenever this
> interrupt is available.
> 
> By default, the pretimeout notification shall occur one second earlier
> than the timeout.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Jorge Ramirez-Ortiz <jorge.ramirez-ortiz@...aro.org>

Can you please give people time to reply before flooding the mailing list
with revisions ? This is getting annoying quite rapidly. I am going to
reply to v2, as I had started on that already (and to the one without
subject before).

Guenter