linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3] watchdog: qcom: support pre-timeout when the bark irq is available

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <97c57a8a-545e-f5de-0756-e8ce054aa036@linaro.org>
Date:   Thu, 5 Sep 2019 22:50:18 +0200
From:   Jorge Ramirez <jorge.ramirez-ortiz@...aro.org>
To:     Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
Cc:     bjorn.andersson@...aro.org, agross@...nel.org,
        wim@...ux-watchdog.org, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-watchdog@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] watchdog: qcom: support pre-timeout when the bark irq
 is available

On 9/5/19 20:34, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 05, 2019 at 08:24:19PM +0200, Jorge Ramirez-Ortiz wrote:
>> Use the bark interrupt as the pre-timeout notifier whenever this
>> interrupt is available.
>>
>> By default, the pretimeout notification shall occur one second earlier
>> than the timeout.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Jorge Ramirez-Ortiz <jorge.ramirez-ortiz@...aro.org>
> 
> Can you please give people time to reply before flooding the mailing list
> with revisions ? This is getting annoying quite rapidly. I am going to
> reply to v2, as I had started on that already (and to the one without
> subject before).

yes, sorry about it. it is not frequent that someone gives a review so
quickly though so I thought I had time to sneak in some reworks - thanks
and apologies again.

I am about to send v4 addressing the issues you raised.

> 
> Guenter
> .
>